From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, jannh@google.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, peterx@redhat.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
ioworker0@gmail.com, baohua@kernel.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
yangyicong@hisilicon.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
namit@vmware.com, hughd@google.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:06:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D9FEC39-98C8-435B-BEA0-BD30EBB05E79@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250428120414.12101-5-dev.jain@arm.com>
On 28 Apr 2025, at 8:04, Dev Jain wrote:
> Override the generic definition to use get_and_clear_full_ptes(), so that
> we do a TLBI possibly only on the "contpte-edges" of the large PTE block,
What do you mean by “contpte-edges”? Can you provide an example?
> instead of doing it for every contpte block, which happens for ptep_get_and_clear().
>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 +++++
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 12 +++++++++---
> include/linux/pgtable.h | 4 ++++
> mm/pgtable-generic.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 2a77f11b78d5..8872ea5f0642 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -1553,6 +1553,11 @@ extern void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
> pte_t old_pte, pte_t new_pte);
>
> +#define modify_prot_start_ptes modify_prot_start_ptes
> +extern pte_t modify_prot_start_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
> + unsigned int nr);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_CONTPTE
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 8fcf59ba39db..fe60be8774f4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1523,7 +1523,8 @@ static int __init prevent_bootmem_remove_init(void)
> early_initcall(prevent_bootmem_remove_init);
> #endif
>
> -pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
> +pte_t modify_prot_start_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> + pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr)
Putting ptes at the end seems to break the naming convention. How about
ptep_modify_prot_range_start? ptes_modify_prot_start might be OK too.
> {
> if (alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2645198)) {
> /*
> @@ -1532,9 +1533,14 @@ pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte
> * in cases where cpu is affected with errata #2645198.
> */
> if (pte_user_exec(ptep_get(ptep)))
> - return ptep_clear_flush(vma, addr, ptep);
> + return clear_flush_ptes(vma, addr, ptep, nr);
> }
> - return ptep_get_and_clear(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep);
> + return get_and_clear_full_ptes(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, nr, 0);
> +}
> +
> +pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
> +{
> + return modify_prot_start_ptes(vma, addr, ptep, 1);
> }
>
> void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> index ed287289335f..10cdb87ccecf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> @@ -828,6 +828,10 @@ extern pte_t ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> pte_t *ptep);
> #endif
>
> +extern pte_t clear_flush_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long address,
> + pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr);
> +
> #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_HUGE_CLEAR_FLUSH
> extern pmd_t pmdp_huge_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long address,
> diff --git a/mm/pgtable-generic.c b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
> index 5a882f2b10f9..e238f88c3cac 100644
> --- a/mm/pgtable-generic.c
> +++ b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
> @@ -90,17 +90,23 @@ int ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> }
> #endif
>
> -#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR_FLUSH
> -pte_t ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> - pte_t *ptep)
> +pte_t clear_flush_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> + pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr)
> {
Ditto.
> struct mm_struct *mm = (vma)->vm_mm;
> pte_t pte;
> - pte = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, ptep);
> + pte = get_and_clear_full_ptes(mm, address, ptep, nr, 0);
> if (pte_accessible(mm, pte))
> - flush_tlb_page(vma, address);
> + flush_tlb_range(vma, address, address + nr * PAGE_SIZE);
> return pte;
> }
> +
> +#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR_FLUSH
> +pte_t ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> + pte_t *ptep)
> +{
> + return clear_flush_ptes(vma, address, ptep, 1);
> +}
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> --
> 2.30.2
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-28 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-28 12:04 [PATCH 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: Refactor code in mprotect Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() by batch-skipping PTEs Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start Dev Jain
2025-04-28 18:06 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2025-04-29 4:44 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_commit Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm: Batch around can_change_pte_writable() Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:50 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-28 12:59 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-28 13:23 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-29 4:59 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-28 13:16 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-28 15:54 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() through PTE-batching Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:52 ` [PATCH 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios Dev Jain
2025-04-28 13:31 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-29 4:40 ` Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D9FEC39-98C8-435B-BEA0-BD30EBB05E79@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox