From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Bill Hartner <hartner@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
mbligh@aracnet.com
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35 + mm1, and 2.5.38 + mm3
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 13:59:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D9B5E1D.2000301@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D9B402D.601E52B6@austin.ibm.com>
Bill Hartner wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>>Bill Hartner wrote:
>>
>>>...
>>>2.5.35 44693 86.1 1.45 1,982,236 KB 5,393,152 KB 7,375,388 KB
>>>2.5.35mm1 39679 99.6 1.50 *2,720,600 KB *6,154,512 KB *8,875,112 KB
>>>
>>
>>2.5.35 was fairly wretched from the swapout point of view.
>>Would be interesting to retest on 2.5.38-mm/2.5.39 sometime.
>>
>
> Here are VolanoMark results for 2.5.38 and 2.5.38-mm3 for both
> 3GB (memory pressure) and 4GB. I will repeat for 2.5.40 mm1 or
> what ever is the latest and greatest on Friday.
Could you possibly include profiling data as well? oprofile would be
preferred, but readprofile would be fine if you can get it. We can
guess what is causing the degredation, but profiles will offer some
hard proof.
--
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-02 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-17 21:14 VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35, and 2.5.35 + mm1 Bill Hartner
2002-09-17 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-18 1:22 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-18 16:10 ` VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and " Bill Hartner
2002-09-18 16:17 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-18 18:42 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and2.5.35 " Bill Hartner
2002-09-27 17:00 ` VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and 2.5.35 " Bill Hartner
2002-09-27 18:32 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-02 18:51 ` VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35 + mm1, and 2.5.38 + mm3 Bill Hartner
2002-10-02 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-02 21:03 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35 +mm1, " Andrew Morton
2002-10-02 20:59 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2002-10-03 13:59 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26+ rmap, 2.5.35 + mm1, " Bill Hartner
2002-10-03 16:43 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D9B5E1D.2000301@us.ibm.com \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=hartner@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox