From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: Bill Hartner <hartner@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
mbligh@aracnet.com
Subject: Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and 2.5.35 + mm1
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:32:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D94A43B.49C65AE8@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D948EA6.A6EFC26B@austin.ibm.com>
Bill Hartner wrote:
>
> ...
> 2.5.35 44693 86.1 1.45 1,982,236 KB 5,393,152 KB 7,375,388 KB
> 2.5.35mm1 39679 99.6 1.50 *2,720,600 KB *6,154,512 KB *8,875,112 KB
>
2.5.35 was fairly wretched from the swapout point of view.
Would be interesting to retest on 2.5.38-mm/2.5.39 sometime.
(This always happens, sorry. But stuff is changing fast)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-27 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-17 21:14 VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35, and " Bill Hartner
2002-09-17 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-18 1:22 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-18 16:10 ` VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and " Bill Hartner
2002-09-18 16:17 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-18 18:42 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and2.5.35 " Bill Hartner
2002-09-27 17:00 ` VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and 2.5.35 " Bill Hartner
2002-09-27 18:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-10-02 18:51 ` VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35 + mm1, and 2.5.38 + mm3 Bill Hartner
2002-10-02 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-02 21:03 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35 +mm1, " Andrew Morton
2002-10-02 20:59 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35 + mm1, " Dave Hansen
2002-10-03 13:59 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26+ " Bill Hartner
2002-10-03 16:43 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D94A43B.49C65AE8@digeo.com \
--to=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=hartner@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox