From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from digeo-nav01.digeo.com (digeo-nav01.digeo.com [192.168.1.233]) by packet.digeo.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA27988 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:04:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3D878ADD.62BA2DF3@digeo.com> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:04:45 -0700 From: Andrew Morton MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Examining the Performance and Cost of Revesemaps on 2.5.26 Under Heavy DBWorkload References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Peter Wong Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, riel@nl.linux.org, mjbligh@us.ibm.com, wli@holomorphy.com, dmccr@us.ibm.comgh@us.ibm.com, Bill Hartner , Troy C Wilson List-ID: Peter Wong wrote: > > ... > My previous note (Sept. 10, 2002) indicated that the memory > consumption for rmaps under 2.5.32 using "readv" is about 223 MB. Thanks, Peter. That's a ton of memory. Where do we stand wrt getting these applications to use large-tlb pages? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/