linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] low-latency zap_page_range()
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:00:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D6E8B7F.8D5D20D8@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1030653602.939.2677.camel@phantasy>

Robert Love wrote:
> 
> ...
> unless we
> wanted to unconditionally drop the locks and let preempt just do the
> right thing and also reduce SMP lock contention in the SMP case.

That's an interesting point.  page_table_lock is one of those locks
which is occasionally held for ages, and frequently held for a short
time.

I suspect that yes, voluntarily popping the lock during the long holdtimes
will allow other CPUs to get on with stuff, and will provide efficiency
increases.  (It's a pretty lame way of doing that though).

But I don't recall seeing nasty page_table_lock spintimes on
anyone's lockmeter reports, so we can leave it as-is for now.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-08-29 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-29 15:31 Robert Love
2002-08-29 20:30 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-29 20:40   ` Robert Love
2002-08-29 20:46     ` Robert Love
2002-08-29 20:59     ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-29 21:38       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-29 21:00     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-08-29 21:12       ` Robert Love
2002-08-29 21:22         ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-29 21:46           ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D6E8B7F.8D5D20D8@zip.com.au \
    --to=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox