linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
Cc: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: MM patches against 2.5.31
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 12:19:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D6BD0A8.74509205@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020827092219.27495.qmail@thales.mathematik.uni-ulm.de>

Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> 
> ...
> So what we want CPUB do instead is
> 
>         spin_lock(lru_lock);
>         page = list_entry(lru)
> 
>         START ATOMIC
>                 page_cache_get(page);
>                 res = (page_count (page) == 1)
>         END ATOMIC
> 
>         if (res) {
>                 atomic_dec (&page->count);
>                 continue;  /* with next page */
>         }
>         ...
>         page_cache_release (page);
> 
> I.e. we want to detect _atomically_ that we just raised the page count
> from zero to one. My patch actually has a solution that implements the
> needed atomic operation above by means of the atomic functions that we
> currently have on all archs (it's called get_page_testzero and
> should probably called get_page_testone).
> The more I think about this the more I think this is the way to go.
> 

Yes, I think that would provide a minimal fix to the problem.
(I'd prefer a solution in which presence on the LRU contributes
to page->count, because that means I can dump a load of expensive
page_cache_get-inside-lru-lock instances, but whatever)

You had:

-#define put_page_testzero(p)   atomic_dec_and_test(&(p)->count)
-#define page_count(p)          atomic_read(&(p)->count)
-#define set_page_count(p,v)    atomic_set(&(p)->count, v)
+#define put_page_testzero(p)   atomic_add_negative(-1, &(p)->count)
+#define page_count(p)          (1+atomic_read(&(p)->count))
+#define set_page_count(p,v)    atomic_set(&(p)->count, v-1)
+#define get_page_testzero(p)   atomic_inc_and_test(&(p)->count)

So the page count is actually offset by -1, and that is hidden by
the macros.  Fair enough.

atomic_add_negative() is not implemented on quite a number of
architectures (sparc64, mips, ppc, sh, cris, 68k, alpha..), so
some legwork is needed there.  Looks to be pretty simple though;
alpha, ppc and others already have atomic_add_return().
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-27 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-22  2:29 Andrew Morton
2002-08-22 11:28 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-26  1:52   ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26  9:10     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-26 14:22       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 15:29         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-26 17:56           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 19:24             ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26 19:34               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 19:48               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-27  9:22               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-27 19:19                 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-08-26 20:00             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-26 20:09               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 20:58                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-27 16:48                   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-28 13:14                     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-28 17:18                       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-28 17:42                         ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-28 20:41                       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-28 21:03                         ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-28 22:04                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-28 22:39                             ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-28 22:57                               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 21:31                 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-27  3:42                   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-27  4:37                     ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-22 15:59 ` Steven Cole
2002-08-22 16:06   ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-22 19:45     ` Steven Cole
2002-08-26  2:15     ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26  2:08       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-26  2:32         ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26  3:06           ` Steven Cole
2002-08-26 22:09 Ed Tomlinson
2002-08-26 23:58 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-27  0:13   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D6BD0A8.74509205@zip.com.au \
    --to=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=phillips@arcor.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox