From: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Martin Bligh <mjbligh@us.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>,
lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [patch] Simple Topology API v0.3 (2/2)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:45:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D654D6F.1050701@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020822202412.B30036@infradead.org>
Christoph,
I've had some comments/flames about that... One of the better suggestions that
I've heard so far is to change it to a /proc interface. I'll probably do that
today and resent the userspace patch. If you (or anyone) has better
suggestions, I'm definitely all ears (or eyes, I suppose ;)!
Cheers!
-Matt
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 12:15:07PM -0700, Matthew Dobson wrote:
>
>>diff -Nur linux-2.5.27-vanilla/kernel/sys.c linux-2.5.27-api/kernel/sys.c
>>--- linux-2.5.27-vanilla/kernel/sys.c Sat Jul 20 12:11:07 2002
>>+++ linux-2.5.27-api/kernel/sys.c Wed Jul 24 17:33:41 2002
>>@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>> #include <linux/times.h>
>> #include <linux/security.h>
>>+#include <linux/topology.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>> #include <asm/io.h>
>>@@ -1236,6 +1237,31 @@
>> mask = xchg(¤t->fs->umask, mask & S_IRWXUGO);
>> return mask;
>> }
>>+
>>+asmlinkage long sys_check_topology(int convert_type, int to_convert)
>>+{
>>+ int ret = 0;
>>+
>>+ switch (convert_type) {
>>+ case CPU_TO_NODE:
>>+ ret = cpu_to_node(to_convert);
>>+ break;
>>+ case MEMBLK_TO_NODE:
>>+ ret = memblk_to_node(to_convert);
>>+ break;
>>+ case NODE_TO_NODE:
>>+ ret = node_to_node(to_convert);
>>+ break;
>>+ case NODE_TO_CPU:
>>+ ret = node_to_cpu(to_convert);
>>+ break;
>>+ case NODE_TO_MEMBLK:
>>+ ret = node_to_memblk(to_convert);
>>+ break;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ return (long)ret;
>>+}
>
>
> You don't consider this a proper syscall API, do you?
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-22 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-22 19:15 Matthew Dobson
2002-08-22 19:24 ` [Lse-tech] " Christoph Hellwig
2002-08-22 20:45 ` Matthew Dobson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D654D6F.1050701@us.ibm.com \
--to=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mjbligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox