From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3D4D87CE.25198C28@zip.com.au> Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 13:00:14 -0700 From: Andrew Morton MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: how not to write a search algorithm References: <3D4CE74A.A827C9BC@zip.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Rik van Riel Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: Rik van Riel wrote: > > ... > > Alan's kernel has a nice-looking implementation. I'll lift that out > > next week unless someone beats me to it. > > Good to hear that you found this one ;) The same test panics Alan's kernel with pte_chain oom, so I can't check whether/how well it fixes it :( 2.5 is no better off wrt pte_chain oom, and I expect it'll oops with this test when per-zone-LRUs are implemented. Is there a proposed way of recovering from pte_chain oom? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/