Re: throttling dirtiers

[Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>]

Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:02:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > But let's back off a bit.   The problem is that a process
> > doing a large write() can penalise innocent processes which
> > want to allocate memory.
> >
> > How to fix that?
> 
> First off, make it obvious where we block in the allocation path (pawning
> off all memory reaping to kswapd et al is an easy first step here).  Then
> make allocators cycle through on a FIFO basis by using something like the
> page reservation patch I came up with a while ago.  That'll give us an
> easy place to change scheduling behaviour.

None of that will preferentially throttle the source of
dirty pages, which seems a good thing to do?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/