* __pa() vs. virt_to_phys()
@ 2002-02-13 20:28 Martin Maletinsky
2002-02-16 12:32 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin Maletinsky @ 2002-02-13 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies, linux-mm
Hi,
Is there any reason to use __pa() rather than virt_to_phys() or vice versa?
On i386 virt_to_phys() is just a function that returns the value returned by __pa(); on Alpha virt_to_phys() is a function that subtracts IDENT_ADDR from the argument,
whereas __pa() is a macro that subtracts PAGE_OFFSET from its argument - however PAGE_OFFSET and IDENT_ADDR expand to the same value; on Sparc virt_to_phys() is a macro
that expands to __pa().
So the two things look to be pretty much the same on different platforms - is there any reason
for having __pa() as well as virt_to_phys(), and which one is to be used by device drivers?
thanks for your help
regards
Martin
--
Supercomputing System AG email: maletinsky@scs.ch
Martin Maletinsky phone: +41 (0)1 445 16 05
Technoparkstrasse 1 fax: +41 (0)1 445 16 10
CH-8005 Zurich
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: __pa() vs. virt_to_phys()
2002-02-13 20:28 __pa() vs. virt_to_phys() Martin Maletinsky
@ 2002-02-16 12:32 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zwane Mwaikambo @ 2002-02-16 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Maletinsky; +Cc: KernelNewbies, linux-mm
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Martin Maletinsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any reason to use __pa() rather than virt_to_phys() or vice versa?
>
> On i386 virt_to_phys() is just a function that returns the value returned by __pa(); on Alpha virt_to_phys() is a function that subtracts IDENT_ADDR from the argument,
> whereas __pa() is a macro that subtracts PAGE_OFFSET from its argument - however PAGE_OFFSET and IDENT_ADDR expand to the same value; on Sparc virt_to_phys() is a macro
> that expands to __pa().
>
> So the two things look to be pretty much the same on different platforms - is there any reason
> for having __pa() as well as virt_to_phys(), and which one is to be used by device drivers?
Try not to use the underlying calls directly, they may change under you,
although these seem less likely, IOW use the API given to you.
Regards,
Zwane Mwaikambo
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-16 12:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-13 20:28 __pa() vs. virt_to_phys() Martin Maletinsky
2002-02-16 12:32 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox