Re[06]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac

["John L. Males" <jlmales@softhome.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andrea,

I can do.  I see this is a VM is of keen interest.  Question for you.
 To really compare apples to apples I could spider a web site or two
just find.  Then the challenge is to replay the "test" on the gui,
say KDE for example.  Do you know of any good tools that would alow
me to do a GUI record/playback?  I can then do an A vs B comparison.

Also, remind me, can I find your kernel to test on the SuSE FTP site
or via kernel.org.  I had tried a few of the SuSE 2.4 kernels a few
levels back and I recall I was going to the people directory of the
FTP site and getting them from mantel I seem to recollect.

I will search about on internet to see if I can find a
record/playback too to get some sort of good A vs B comparison.


Regards,

John L. Males
Willowdale, Ontario
Canada
12 October 2001 01:33
mailto:jlmales@softhome.net


Date sent:      	Fri, 12 Oct 2001 07:09:30 +0200
From:           	Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To:             	Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Copies to:      	jlmales@softhome.net, Rik van Riel
<riel@conectiva.com.br>,
       	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject:        	Re: Re[02]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac

> On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 12:41:19AM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> > On Fri, 2001-10-12 at 01:33, John L. Males wrote:
> > > I just found out about your desire to have some workstation
> > > testing done to get feedback on your current VM patch.
> > >
> > > I am currently using Kernel 2.4.9-ac18.  I am still not happy
> > > about some of the memory management.  I love to try your patch.
> > >  I would be willing to do so against the 2.4.10-ac11 Kernel if
> > > a patch is available.  If Alan is going to implement this patch
> > > in a later 2.4.10-acxx patch I will wait patiently.
> >
> > Said patch and other VM work is in 2.4.10-ac12.  Get that and
> > report back.
>
> Later, if you've some time to test, I'd also be very interested in
> a comparison with 2.4.12aa1.
>
> Andrea


- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use
<http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBO8aOyOAqzTDdanI2EQLa4ACg8+jxwCGBvKXasN0skSmdwMEiXKsAoODH
m39x4FgquaNCVx0E8lHjHynA
=I7rv
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.2 -- QDPGP 2.61a
Comment: .

iQA/AwUBO8aO1+AqzTDdanI2EQJ5nQCg/HNvrm0yn1OTj59A5c1hWhTVkZsAoJQ1
HxKRZsIwASJaTsgaIX/eF3sR
=HExG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


"Boooomer ... Boom Boom, how are you Boom Boom" Boomer 1985 - February/2000

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/