From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modified memory_pressure calculation
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 20:24:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B114667.DCC8A2B7@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105271451120.1907-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1131 bytes --]
Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 May 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote:
>
> > > if (z->free_pages < z->pages_min / 4 &&
> > > - !(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
> > > + (in_interrupt() || !(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)))
> > > continue;
> >
> > It's 'if (in_interrupt()) continue', not 'if (in_interrupt()) alloc'.
> > Currently a network card can allocate the last few pages if the
> > interrupt occurs in the context of the PF_MEMALLOC thread. I think
> > PF_MEMALLOC memory should never be available to interrupt handlers.
>
> You're right, my mistake.
>
Ok, then the attached patch should be ok [SMP safe 'memory_pressure--' +
the change above].
I've moved the modified memory_pressure calculation into my 'not_now'
folder - not enough time for proper testing, and the change definitively
needs thorough testing.
We should take into account that the current page owner can reactivage a
page, i.e. nr_inactive_{dirty,clean}_pages overestimates the number of
really inactive pages in these lists.
My modified memory_pressure calculation would be one way to implement
that.
--
Manfred
[-- Attachment #2: patch-PF --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 738 bytes --]
diff -u 2.4/mm/page_alloc.c build-2.4/mm/page_alloc.c
--- 2.4/mm/page_alloc.c Sat May 26 10:06:29 2001
+++ build-2.4/mm/page_alloc.c Sun May 27 20:12:23 2001
@@ -141,8 +141,11 @@
* since it's nothing important, but we do want to make sure
* it never gets negative.
*/
- if (memory_pressure > NR_CPUS)
- memory_pressure--;
+ {
+ int mp = memory_pressure-1;
+ if (mp > 0)
+ memory_pressure = mp;
+ }
}
#define MARK_USED(index, order, area) \
@@ -476,7 +479,7 @@
/* XXX: is pages_min/4 a good amount to reserve for this? */
if (z->free_pages < z->pages_min / 4 &&
- !(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
+ (in_interrupt() || !(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)))
continue;
page = rmqueue(z, order);
if (page)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-27 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-27 12:30 Manfred Spraul
2001-05-27 15:58 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-27 17:44 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-05-27 17:51 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-27 18:24 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2001-05-27 18:40 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-28 17:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-28 19:20 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-05-28 18:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B114667.DCC8A2B7@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox