* MM performance benchmark
@ 2001-05-07 22:02 Randy Appleton
2001-05-09 14:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Randy Appleton @ 2001-05-07 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 799 bytes --]
Hi!
I'm a professor of computer science at Northern Michigan University.
Three students and myself
have been benchmarking the Linux kernel. At
http://euclid.nmu.edu/~benchmark you will see
graphs describing performance for mmap() and page faults.
Both graphs show a huge improvement between 2.2 and 2.3. We see a 100x
performance
gain. My questions is ... Why has performance improved so much? What
changed between
2.2 and 2.3 to account for a 100x performance improvement?
-Much Thanks
-Randy
--
========================================================================
|| Randy Appleton, Professor of Computer Science at Northern Michigan ||
|| University. And a big fan of Linux! ||
================= mailto:randy@euclid.nmu.edu ==========================
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1193 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Card for Randy Appleton --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 193 bytes --]
begin:vcard
n:Appleton;Randy
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:Northern Michigan University
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:rappleto@nmu.edu
title:Dr.
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Randy Appleton
end:vcard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: MM performance benchmark
2001-05-07 22:02 MM performance benchmark Randy Appleton
@ 2001-05-09 14:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2001-05-09 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Appleton; +Cc: linux-mm
Randy Appleton <rappleto@nmu.edu> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I'm a professor of computer science at Northern Michigan University.
> Three students and myself
> have been benchmarking the Linux kernel. At
> http://euclid.nmu.edu/~benchmark you will see
> graphs describing performance for mmap() and page faults.
>
> Both graphs show a huge improvement between 2.2 and 2.3. We see a 100x
> performance
> gain. My questions is ... Why has performance improved so much? What
> changed between
> 2.2 and 2.3 to account for a 100x performance improvement?
The page cache usage was rewritten to be threaded, and more
importantly to not double buffer data between the page cache and the
buffer cache.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-09 14:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-07 22:02 MM performance benchmark Randy Appleton
2001-05-09 14:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox