From: "Richard F Weber" <rfweber@link.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: About reading /proc/*/mem
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 12:53:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AEEEA09.7000301@link.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1oftdozsi.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1919 bytes --]
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>"Richard F Weber" <rfweber@link.com> writes:
>
>>Ok, so as a rehash, the ptrace & open(),lseek() on /proc/*/mem should
>>both work about the same. After a lot of struggling, I've gotten the
>>ptrace to work right & spit out the data I want/need. However there is
>>one small problem, SIGSTOP.
>>
>>ptrace() appears to set up the child process to do a SIGSTOP whenever
>>any interrupt is received. Which is kind of a bad thing for what I'm
>>looking to do. I guess I'm trying to write a non-intrusive debugger
>>that can be used to view static variables stored in the heap of an
>>application.
>>
>>On other OS's, this can be done just by popping open /proc/*/mem, and
>>reading the data as needed, allowing the child process to continue
>>processing away as if nothing is going on. I'm looking to do the same
>>sort of task under Linux.
>>
>>Unfortunately, ptrace() probobally isn't going to allow me to do that.
>>So my next question is does opening /proc/*/mem force the child process
>>to stop on every interrupt (just like ptrace?)
>>
>
>
>The not stopping the child should be the major difference between
>/proc/*/mem and ptrace.
>
See this is where I start seeming to have problems. I can open
/proc/*/mem & lseek, but reads come back as "No such process". However,
if I first do a ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH), then I can read the data, but the
process stops. I've kind of dug through the sys_ptrace() code under
/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c, and can see and understand
generally what it's doing, but that's getting into serious kernel-land
stuff. I wouldn't expect it to be this difficult to just open up
another processes /proc/*/mem file to read data from.
Is there something obvious I'm missing? It seems to keep pointing back
to ptrace & /proc/*/mem are very closely related (ie: the same)
including stopping of the child.
Thanks.
--Rich
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2339 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-01 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-01 13:33 Richard F Weber
2001-05-01 15:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-05-01 16:35 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-01 17:03 ` Richard F Weber
2001-05-01 17:14 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-02 10:25 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-02 11:39 ` Richard F Weber
2001-05-03 17:51 ` Richard F Weber
2001-05-01 16:53 ` Richard F Weber [this message]
2001-05-01 17:09 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-01 17:29 ` Richard F Weber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AEEEA09.7000301@link.com \
--to=rfweber@link.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox