linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uman <a.lahun@editec-lotteries.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: limit for number of processes
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:58:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ADC21C4.3000807@editec-lotteries.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200104121659.f3CGxX714605@tuttle.kansas.net>

hello.
Yesterday when i wrote program which use fork for every connection, and
made stupid mistake. So i tested my PC(kernel 2.4.3-pre2+xfs) with 
something like
while(1){
fork();
}
i had ulimit 4000 processes  but my box became completely unresponsible 
in X.
As i understood it started to use swap intensively . But amount of 
memory was enough
so no OOM killing. The only thing i could do is to reboot.
After testing  i found that if i create up to 3200 processes i still can 
Ctrl-C  and everything
will be good. If i have more i can kill them but  kernel threads , as i 
understand, continue
to thrash system and the only thing i can do Sys-Rq. 
So my question is , what is amount of processes kernel can support (if  
i have enough memory)
without  thrashing  my system  and requiring reboot for  normal job.
Thank you.
Andrei.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

      parent reply	other threads:[~2001-04-17 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-12 16:58 [PATCH] a simple OOM killer to save me from Netscape Slats Grobnik
2001-04-12 18:25 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-12 18:49   ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-13  6:45   ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-04-13 16:20     ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-14  1:20       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-04-16 21:06         ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-16 21:40           ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-16 22:12             ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-16 22:21             ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-17 14:26               ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-17 19:53                 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-17 20:44                   ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-17 20:59                     ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-17 21:09                       ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-14  7:00       ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-04-15  5:05         ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-15  5:20           ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-16 11:52         ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-16 12:17       ` suspend processes at load (was Re: a simple OOM ...) Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-17 19:48         ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-18 21:32           ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-18 20:38             ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-18 23:25               ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-18 22:29                 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 10:14                   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-04-19 13:23                   ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-19  2:11                 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-19  7:08                   ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-19 13:37                     ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-19 12:26                       ` Christoph Rohland
2001-04-19 12:30                       ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-19  9:15                 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-19 18:34             ` Dave McCracken
2001-04-19 18:47               ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-19 18:53                 ` Dave McCracken
2001-04-19 19:10                   ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-20 14:58                     ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-21  6:10                       ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-19 19:13                   ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 19:47                     ` Gerrit Huizenga
2001-04-20 12:44                       ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-19 20:06                     ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-20 12:29                     ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-20 11:50                       ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-20 13:32                         ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-20 14:30                           ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-22 10:21                       ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-20 12:25                 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-21  6:08                   ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-20 12:18               ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-22 10:19                 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-17 10:58 ` Uman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3ADC21C4.3000807@editec-lotteries.com \
    --to=a.lahun@editec-lotteries.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox