* [PATCH] oom-killer trigger
@ 2001-03-01 22:31 Rik van Riel
2001-03-01 22:51 ` David Mansfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2001-03-01 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-mm, XosÉ Vázquez, linux-kernel
Hi,
the OOM killer in Linux 2.4 has a rather embarrasing bug.
1. the OOM killer never triggers if we have > freepages.min
of free memory
2. __alloc_pages() never allocates pages to < freepages.min
for user allocations
==> the OOM killer never gets triggered under some workloads;
the system just sits around with nr_free_pages == freepages.min
The patch below trivially fixes this by upping the OOM kill limit
by a really small number of pages ...
Now lets hope it won't trigger too early (but since it'll only
trigger when we're completely out of swap, etc...).
regards,
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
--- mm/oom_kill.c.orig Thu Mar 1 18:57:11 2001
+++ mm/oom_kill.c Thu Mar 1 18:58:23 2001
@@ -188,13 +188,17 @@
*
* Returns 0 if there is still enough memory left,
* 1 when we are out of memory (otherwise).
+ *
+ * Note that since __alloc_pages() never lets user
+ * allocations go below freepages.min, we have to
+ * use a slightly higher threshold here...
*/
int out_of_memory(void)
{
struct sysinfo swp_info;
/* Enough free memory? Not OOM. */
- if (nr_free_pages() > freepages.min)
+ if (nr_free_pages() > freepages.min + 4)
return 0;
if (nr_free_pages() + nr_inactive_clean_pages() > freepages.low)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] oom-killer trigger
2001-03-01 22:31 [PATCH] oom-killer trigger Rik van Riel
@ 2001-03-01 22:51 ` David Mansfield
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Mansfield @ 2001-03-01 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rik van Riel; +Cc: Alan Cox, linux-mm, XosÉ Vázquez, linux-kernel
>
> 1. the OOM killer never triggers if we have > freepages.min
> of free memory
> 2. __alloc_pages() never allocates pages to < freepages.min
> for user allocations
>
> ==> the OOM killer never gets triggered under some workloads;
> the system just sits around with nr_free_pages == freepages.min
>
> The patch below trivially fixes this by upping the OOM kill limit
> by a really small number of pages ...
> + if (nr_free_pages() > freepages.min + 4)
Call me stupid, but why not just change the > to >= (or < to <=) rather
than introducing a magic number (4). Or at least make the magic number
interesting, like:
+ if (nr_free_pages() > freepages.min + 42)
:-)
Thanks for the bugfix,
David
--
David Mansfield (718) 963-2020
david@ultramaster.com
Ultramaster Group, LLC www.ultramaster.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-03-01 22:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-03-01 22:31 [PATCH] oom-killer trigger Rik van Riel
2001-03-01 22:51 ` David Mansfield
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox