From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: fix a deadlock warning in kmem_cache_destroy
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 13:40:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39a3470f-06ab-cf41-32e4-80edb249c7d3@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YeU4B46F+oFUBRLE@linutronix.de>
+CC Clark
On 1/17/22 10:33, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-01-17 16:32:46 [+0800], Xin Long wrote:
>> another issue. From the code analysis, this issue does exist on the
>> upstream kernel, though I couldn't build an upstream RT kernel for the
>> testing.
>
> This should also reproduce in v5.16 since the commit in question is
> there.
Yeah. I remember we had some issues with the commit during development, but
I'd hope those were resolved and the commit that's ultimately merged got the
fixes, see this subthread:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/0b36128c-3e12-77df-85fe-a153a714569b@quicinc.com/
>> > > CPU0 CPU1
>> > > ---- ----
>> > > cpus_read_lock()
>> > > kn->active++
>> > > cpus_read_lock() [a]
>> > > wait until kn->active == 0
>> > >
>> > > Although cpu_hotplug_lock is a RWSEM, [a] will not block in there. But as
>> > > lockdep annotations are added for cpu_hotplug_lock, a deadlock warning
>> > > would be detected:
>
> The cpu_hotplug_lock is a per-CPU RWSEM. The lock in [a] will block if
> there is a writer pending.
>
>> > > ======================================================
>> > > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
>> > > ------------------------------------------------------
>> > > dmsetup/1832 is trying to acquire lock:
>> > > ffff986f5a0f9f20 (kn->count#144){++++}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_remove+0x1d/0x30
>> > >
>> > > but task is already holding lock:
>> > > ffffffffa43817c0 (slab_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kmem_cache_destroy+0x2a/0x120
>> > >
>
> I tried to create & destroy a cryptarget which creates/destroy a cache
> via bio_put_slab(). Either the callchain is different or something else
> is but I didn't see a lockdep warning.
RHEL-8 kernel seems to be 4.18, unless RT uses a newer one. Could be some
silently relevant backport is missing? How about e.g. 59450bbc12be ("mm,
slab, slub: stop taking cpu hotplug lock") ?
> Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-14 14:23 Xin Long
2022-01-16 6:35 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-01-17 8:32 ` Xin Long
2022-01-17 9:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-17 12:40 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
[not found] ` <20220117131304.pdc3mfdowkzovw6q@localhost.localdomain>
2022-01-18 8:00 ` Xin Long
2022-01-18 11:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-01-19 8:38 ` Xin Long
2022-06-01 14:36 ` Maurizio Lombardi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39a3470f-06ab-cf41-32e4-80edb249c7d3@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox