Ingo Molnar wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > > so dns helper is killed first, then netscape. (my idea might not
> > > make sense though.)
> >
> > It makes some sense, but I don't think OOM is something that
> > occurs often enough to care about it /that/ much...
>
> i'm trying to handle Andrea's case, the init=/bin/bash manual-bootup case,
> with 4MB RAM and no swap, where the admin tries to exec a 2MB process. I
> think it's a legitimate concern - i cannot know in advance whether a
> freshly started process would trigger an OOM or not.
>
>         Ingo
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Everybody seems to agreed that depending of the goal, we may kill interactive
process or niced process. What
about a tunable OOM killer with a /proc/ file which would indicate which sort
of process to kill ?

--
%--IRIN->-Institut-de-Recherche-en-Informatique-de-Nantes-----------------%
% FORT David,                                                             %
% 7 avenue de la morvandiere                                   0240726275 %
% 44470 Thouare, France                                epopo@onetelnet.fr %
% ICU:78064991   AIM: enlighted popo             fort@irin.univ-nantes.fr %
%--LINUX-HTTPD-PIOGENE----------------------------------------------------%
%  -datamining <-/                        |   .~.                         %
%  -networking/flashed PHP3 coming soon   |   /V\        L  I  N  U  X    %
%  -opensource                            |  // \\     >Fear the Penguin< %
%  -GNOME/enlightenment/GIMP              | /(   )\                       %
%           feel enlighted....            |  ^^-^^                        %
%                             http://ibonneace.dyndns.org/ when connected %
%-------------------------------------------------------------------------%