From: Benjamin Redelings I <bredelin@ucla.edu>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Happiness with t8-vmpatch4 (was Re: Does page-aging really work?)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 00:09:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39C31C9F.1C202CD8@ucla.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009081937020.1206-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
Hi guys -
I have done a few small tests on t8-vmpatch4 (64Mb RAM, 166Mhz UP
PPro), and I must say that I am very happy with the results. More
comparison with test8 vanilla confirms that Rik's version is much more
responsive, also that Rik is (or course) correct - unused process are
indeed swapped out, but shared pages from (I assume) libc remain.
Observations:
1. test8-vmpatch4 does not swap very much at first, but then swaps a
lot of memory in a short time when triggered.
Specifically, I untarred a kernel source tree and saw NO swapping .
The working set was NOT evicted :) I then started more programs, and
saw that the cache shrunk a lot: still no swapping. Then I ran the
untar again, and the kernel swapped out 22Mb very quickly. However, I
must say that it was still very smooth - I didn't even notice the
swapping until I looked at xosview; normally it is quite audible. Also,
the choice of pages for swapping out seemed to be VERY accurate - there
was virtually no page-in as long as I was watching...
2. I guess we could wish that unused programs got swapped a bit sooner
instead of all at once - but presumably that can be tuned.
Congrats on the great code! Tuning does indeed seem to be fixing the
problems that I saw before.
thanks again,
-BenRI
--
"I want to be in the light, as He is in the Light,
I want to shine like the stars in the heavens." - DC Talk, "In the
Light"
Benjamin Redelings I <>< http://www.bol.ucla.edu/~bredelin/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-09-16 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-09-08 21:34 Multiqueue VM Patch OK? Does page-aging really work? Benjamin Redelings I
2000-09-08 22:58 ` Rik van Riel
2000-09-16 7:09 ` Benjamin Redelings I [this message]
2000-09-16 7:57 ` Happiness with t8-vmpatch4 (was Re: Does page-aging really work?) Rik van Riel
2000-09-16 18:20 ` Benjamin Redelings I
2000-09-16 18:22 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39C31C9F.1C202CD8@ucla.edu \
--to=bredelin@ucla.edu \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox