From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: schedule/sleep over mmget()
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:20:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <398032e7-7cbf-3a28-75a7-f6586465f0c6@kernel.dk> (raw)
Hi,
Got a question that I couldn't immediately find an answer to. io_uring
currently jumps through a few hoops to avoid holding a process mm over
schedule, and it doesn't look like that's necessary.
Is it fine for a kthread to do mmget/kthread_use_mm at the start, and
only put/unuse when it exits? Or is it more prudent to drop/re-acquire
over schedule for potential longer periods of idleness?
Thanks,
--
Jens Axboe
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-18 15:20 Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-06-19 11:43 ` Michal Hocko
2020-06-19 13:59 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=398032e7-7cbf-3a28-75a7-f6586465f0c6@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox