From: "Scott F. Kaplan" <sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:55:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39731E78.C152D049@cs.amherst.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200007171446.KAA07554@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Alan Cox wrote:
> Modern OS designers are consistently seeing LFU work better. In our case this
> is partly theory in the FreeBSD case its proven by trying it.
Have any of the FreeBSD people compiled some results to this effect?
I'd be interested to see under what circumstances LFU works better, and
just what approximations of both LRU and LFU are being used. There
could be something interesting in such results, as years of other
experiments have shown otherwise.
Scott Kaplan
sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu
http://www.cs.amherst.edu/~sfkaplan
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-07-17 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20000629114407.A3914@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006291330520.1713-100000@inspiron.random>
2000-06-29 13:00 ` [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2 Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-07-06 10:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-07-06 13:29 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-07-09 17:11 ` Swap clustering with new VM Marcelo Tosatti
2000-07-09 20:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-07-11 9:36 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-07-09 20:31 ` [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2 Andrea Arcangeli
2000-07-11 11:50 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-07-11 16:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-07-11 16:36 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-07-11 17:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-07-11 17:45 ` Rik van Riel
2000-07-11 17:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-07-11 18:03 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-07-11 19:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-07-12 0:05 ` John Alvord
2000-07-12 0:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-07-12 18:02 ` Rik van Riel
2000-07-14 8:51 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-07-11 17:32 ` Rik van Riel
2000-07-11 17:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-07-11 17:47 ` Rik van Riel
2000-07-11 18:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-07-11 18:06 ` Rik van Riel
2000-07-17 7:09 ` [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Yannis Smaragdakis
2000-07-17 9:28 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-07-17 13:01 ` James Manning
2000-07-17 14:32 ` Scott F. Kaplan
2000-07-17 14:53 ` Rik van Riel
2000-07-17 16:44 ` Manfred Spraul
2000-07-17 17:02 ` Rik van Riel
2000-07-17 18:55 ` Yannis Smaragdakis
2000-07-17 19:57 ` John Fremlin
2000-07-17 14:46 ` Alan Cox
2000-07-17 14:55 ` Scott F. Kaplan [this message]
2000-07-17 15:31 ` Rik van Riel
2000-07-14 9:01 ` [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2 Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-07-11 18:13 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-07-11 20:57 ` Roger Larsson
2000-07-11 22:49 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-07-12 16:01 ` Kev
2000-07-06 13:54 ` [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on2.4.0-test2 Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39731E78.C152D049@cs.amherst.edu \
--to=sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox