From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@timpanogas.com>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: "Quintela Carreira Juan J." <quintela@fi.udc.es>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
Hans Reiser <hans@reiser.to>, bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Alexander Zarochentcev <zam@odintsovo.comcor.ru>
Subject: Re: journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code)
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 11:10:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <393E8204.D7AAACC5@timpanogas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000607163519.S30951@redhat.com>
Stephen,
When will the journalling subsystem you are working on be available, and
where can I get it to start integration work. It sounds like you will
be "bundling" associated LRU meta-data blocks in the buffer cache for
journal commits? What Alan described to me sounds fairly decent. I am
wondering when you will have this posted so the rest of us can
instrument your journalling code into our FS's.
Please advise.
:-)
Jeff
"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 05:20:41PM +0200, Quintela Carreira Juan J. wrote:
> >
> > stephen> It doesn't matter. *If* the filesystem knows better than the
> > stephen> page cleaner what progress can be made, then let the filesystem
> > stephen> make progress where it can. There are likely to be transaction
> > stephen> dependencies which mean we have to clean some pages in a specific
> > stephen> order. As soon as the page cleaner starts exerting back pressure
> > stephen> on the filesystem, the filesystem needs to start clearing stuff,
> > stephen> and if that means we have to start cleaning things that shrink_
> > stephen> mmap didn't expect us to, then that's fine.
> >
> > I don't like that, if you put some page in the LRU cache, that means
> > that you think that _this_ page is freeable.
>
> Remember that Rik is talking about multiple LRUs. Pages can only
> be on the inactive LRU if they are clean and unpinned, yes, but we
> still need a way of tracking pages which are in a more difficult
> state.
>
> > If you need pages in the LRU cache only for getting notifications,
> > then change the system to send notifications each time that we are
> > short of memory.
>
> It's a matter of pressure. The filesystem with most pages in the LRU
> cache, or with the oldest pages there, should stand the greatest chance
> of being the first one told to clean up its act.
>
> Cheers,
> Stephen
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-06-07 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006060811120.15888-100000@dax.joh.cam.ac.uk>
[not found] ` <393CA40C.648D3261@reiser.to>
[not found] ` <20000606114851.A30672@home.ds9a.nl>
[not found] ` <393CBBB8.554A0D2A@reiser.to>
[not found] ` <20000606172606.I25794@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <393D37D1.1BC61DC3@reiser.to>
[not found] ` <20000606205447.T23701@redhat.com>
2000-06-06 23:06 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not " Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 1:19 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot " Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 1:46 ` Quintela Carreira Juan J.
2000-06-07 3:45 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 11:15 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 13:23 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 13:41 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 14:27 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 14:46 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 14:51 ` bert hubert
2000-06-07 15:20 ` Quintela Carreira Juan J.
2000-06-07 15:35 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 15:41 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 15:44 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 17:10 ` Jeff V. Merkey [this message]
2000-06-07 17:14 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 17:21 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-06-07 20:16 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 21:20 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 21:52 ` journaling & VM Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 22:11 ` James Sutherland
2000-06-07 22:29 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-08 1:11 ` Neil Schemenauer
2000-06-08 1:29 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 20:16 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code) Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 20:54 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 21:29 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 21:31 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 21:33 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 22:20 ` journaling & VM Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 21:50 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code) Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 19:02 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel:it'snot " Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 13:40 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot " Chris Mason
2000-06-07 13:47 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 11:12 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 16:35 ` journaling & VM John Fremlin
2000-06-07 17:11 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
[not found] ` <20000608114435.A15433@uni-koblenz.de>
2000-06-08 21:29 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-09 11:53 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-06-07 17:48 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code) Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 18:01 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 19:58 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 20:56 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 21:14 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 21:24 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 21:40 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 21:49 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 22:00 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 22:22 ` Manfred Spraul
2000-06-09 15:08 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-09 16:52 ` Manfred Spraul
2000-06-09 17:23 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-09 18:26 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel:it'snot " Manfred Spraul
2000-06-07 22:28 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot " Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 10:10 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not " Stephen C. Tweedie
[not found] ` <393DACC8.5DB60A81@reiser.to>
2000-06-07 11:00 ` reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not just the code Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 17:11 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 17:13 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 17:46 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 19:53 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=393E8204.D7AAACC5@timpanogas.com \
--to=jmerkey@timpanogas.com \
--cc=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=hans@reiser.to \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=quintela@fi.udc.es \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=zam@odintsovo.comcor.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox