From: Hans Reiser <hans@reiser.to>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Sasi Peter <sape@iq.rulez.org>,
riel@nl.linux.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu,
"Vladimir V. Saveliev" <vs@namesys.botik.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.3.99-pre6-7 VM rebalanced
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 15:50:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <390CB8C1.E2C440FD@reiser.to> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000430173948.A26377@fred.muc.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 05:27:51PM +0200, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > The problem with this is that even if the kernel is in .99 pre-release
> > > state for several weeks _nothing_ has been changed in it about the RAID
> > > stuff still, so a lot of people using 2.2 + raid 0.90 patch (eg. RedHat
> > > users) _cannot_ change to and try 2.3.99, because their partitions would
> > > not mount.
> > >
> > > It seems to me, that if we are talking about widening the testbase for
> > > 2.3.99, this is the most important item on Alan's todo list.
> >
> > In some ways it probably is. Almost every production site I would feed stuff
> > to is using raid 0.90 and some of them are now using ext3 as well.
>
> Here I have similar problems with reiserfs (a lot of sites use it
> already, upto reiserfs root). So far the 2.3 port cannot read 2.2
> file systems.
>
> Andi
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
It can read 2.2 file systems, though once you mount it under 2.3 you can never
go back. We are fixing that by having a -noconv mount option to prevent
conversion to the new format, but the code is not done yet.
Hans
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-04-30 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-04-26 22:03 Rik van Riel
2000-04-30 2:01 ` Sasi Peter
2000-04-30 15:18 ` Alan Cox
2000-04-30 15:39 ` Andi Kleen
2000-04-30 22:50 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=390CB8C1.E2C440FD@reiser.to \
--to=hans@reiser.to \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@nl.linux.org \
--cc=sape@iq.rulez.org \
--cc=vs@namesys.botik.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox