linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCHV2 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 23:46:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F39F85DBE@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151215114314.GD25973@pd.tnic>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1176 bytes --]

>> +	/* Fault was in recoverable area of the kernel */
>> +	if ((m.cs & 3) != 3 && worst == MCE_AR_SEVERITY)
>> +		if (!fixup_mcexception(regs, m.addr))
>> +			mce_panic("Failed kernel mode recovery", &m, NULL);
>				   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Does that always imply a failed kernel mode recovery? I don't see
>
>	(m.cs == 0 and MCE_AR_SEVERITY)
>
> MCEs always meaning that a recovery should be attempted there. I think
> this should simply say
>
>	mce_panic("Fatal machine check on current CPU", &m, msg);

I don't think this can ever happen. If we were in kernel mode and decided
that the severity was AR_SEVERITY ... then search_mcexception_table()
found an entry for the IP where the machine check happened.

The only way for fixup_exception to fail is if search_mcexception_table()
now suddenly doesn't find the entry it found earlier.

But if this "can't happen" thing actually does happen ... I'd like the panic
message to be different from other mce_panic() so you'll know to blame
me.

Applied all the other suggestions.

-Tony

N‹§²æìr¸›zǧu©ž²Æ {\b­†éì¹»\x1c®&Þ–)îÆi¢žØ^n‡r¶‰šŽŠÝ¢j$½§$¢¸\x05¢¹¨­è§~Š'.)îÄÃ,yèm¶ŸÿÃ\f%Š{±šj+ƒðèž×¦j)Z†·Ÿ

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-15 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-11 19:13 [PATCHV2 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison Tony Luck
2015-12-10 21:58 ` [PATCHV2 1/3] x86, ras: Add new infrastructure for machine check fixup tables Tony Luck
2015-12-11 20:06   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-11 21:01     ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-12 10:11   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-14 17:58     ` Ross Zwisler
2015-12-14 22:27       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15  1:00     ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-15  9:46       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15 10:44         ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-11  0:14 ` [PATCHV2 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas Tony Luck
2015-12-11 20:08   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-15 11:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15 23:46     ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2015-12-11  0:21 ` [PATCHV2 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks Tony Luck
2015-12-11 20:09   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-11 21:19     ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-11 21:32       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-12-11 21:50       ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-11 22:17         ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-11 22:20           ` Dan Williams
2015-12-11 22:26             ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-11 22:35               ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-11 22:38                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-11 22:45                   ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-11 22:55                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-14  8:36                       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-14 19:46                         ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-14 20:11                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-15 13:11   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15 17:45     ` Dan Williams
2015-12-15 17:53       ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-15 18:21         ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15 18:27         ` Dan Williams
2015-12-15 18:35           ` Dan Williams
2015-12-15 18:39             ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15 19:19               ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
2015-12-15 19:28                 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15 20:25                   ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
2015-12-21 17:33                     ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F39F85DBE@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox