linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE context
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:14:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F32870C55@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140721084737.GA10016@pd.tnic>

> This patch is overengineered even though we already have both process
> context work and irq work facilities in place.
>
> We also already have mce_ring where we add MCE signatures in #MC
> context. Well, only for AO errors with usable addresses for now, at
> least.

We've evolved a bunch of mechanisms:

1) mce_ring: to pass pfn for AO errors from MCE context to a work thread
2) mce_info: to pass pfn for AR errors from MCE context to same process running in process context
3) mce_log: to pass entire "mce" structures from any context (MCE, CMCI, or init-time) to /dev/mcelog

something simpler might be nice - but a generic thing that is overkill for each of the
specialized uses might not necessarily be an improvement.

E.g. #3 above has a fixed capacity (MCE_LOG_LEN) and just drops any extras if it should fill
up (deliberately, because we almost always prefer to see the first bunch of errors rather
than the newest).

> I think it would be a *lot* simpler if you modify the logic to put all
> errors into the ring and remove the call chain call from mce_log().

I was actually wondering about going in the other direction. Make the
/dev/mcelog code register a notifier on x86_mce_decoder_chain (and
perhaps move all the /dev/mcelog functions out of mce.c into an actual
driver file).  Then use Chen Gong's NMI safe code to just unconditionally
make safe copies of anything that gets passed to mce_log() and run all
the notifiers from his do_mce_irqwork().

-Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-21 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-16  2:34 Some RAS bug fix patches Chen, Gong
2014-07-16  2:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] APEI, GHES: Cleanup unnecessary function for lock-less list Chen, Gong
2014-07-20  8:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-16  2:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE context Chen, Gong
2014-07-21  8:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-21 17:14     ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2014-07-21 21:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-21 22:03         ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-21 22:44           ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE Tony Luck
2014-07-22 17:20             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-22 17:26           ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE context Borislav Petkov
2014-07-22 21:24             ` Tony Luck
2014-07-23  7:48       ` Chen, Gong
2014-07-16  2:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] RAS, HWPOISON: Fix wrong error recovery status Chen, Gong
2014-07-16 19:57   ` Naoya Horiguchi
2014-07-19  8:05 ` Some RAS bug fix patches Chen, Gong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F32870C55@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox