From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, big-sleep-vuln-reports@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/secretmem: fix use-after-free race in fault handler
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 11:19:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38f0ff98-3dcd-4dc2-87f1-3ea34bb9935a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aQSIdCpf-2pJLwAF@kernel.org>
On 31.10.25 10:59, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 05:18:18PM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
>> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>>
>> The error path in secretmem_fault() frees a folio before restoring its
>> direct map status, which is a race leading to a panic.
>
> Let's use the issue description from the report:
>
> When a page fault occurs in a secret memory file created with
> `memfd_secret(2)`, the kernel will allocate a new folio for it, mark
> the underlying page as not-present in the direct map, and add it to
> the file mapping.
>
> If two tasks cause a fault in the same page concurrently, both could
> end up allocating a folio and removing the page from the direct map,
> but only one would succeed in adding the folio to the file
> mapping. The task that failed undoes the effects of its attempt by (a)
> freeing the folio again and (b) putting the page back into the direct
> map. However, by doing these two operations in this order, the page
> becomes available to the allocator again before it is placed back in
> the direct mapping.
>
> If another task attempts to allocate the page between (a) and (b), and
> the kernel tries to access it via the direct map, it would result in a
> supervisor not-present page fault.
>
>> Fix the ordering to restore the map before the folio is freed.
>
> ... restore the direct map
>
> With these changes
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Fully agreed
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-31 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-30 15:34 Oops in secretmem_fault() Big Sleep
2025-10-31 1:36 ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-31 11:48 ` Big Sleep
2025-10-31 9:18 ` [PATCH 1/1] mm/secretmem: fix use-after-free race in fault handler Lance Yang
2025-10-31 9:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-31 10:19 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-10-31 10:35 ` Lance Yang
2025-10-31 10:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-31 10:34 ` Lance Yang
2025-10-31 10:34 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38f0ff98-3dcd-4dc2-87f1-3ea34bb9935a@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=big-sleep-vuln-reports@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox