From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com, chrisl@kernel.org,
kasong@tencent.com, peterx@redhat.com, surenb@google.com,
v-songbaohua@oppo.com, willy@infradead.org,
yosryahmed@google.com, yuzhao@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: add per-order mTHP alloc_success and alloc_fail counters
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 11:04:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38eee542-8567-4c42-ad63-778b4a20c153@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a53e4209-b2cd-4250-b09a-70dc8aa10d42@arm.com>
On 05.04.24 09:21, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 05/04/2024 07:29, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 05.04.24 06:01, Barry Song wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:57 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 4:31 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04.04.24 09:21, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>>>>> On 03/04/2024 22:00, Barry Song wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:48 AM Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 03/04/2024 09:22, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 03.04.24 05:55, Barry Song wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Profiling a system blindly with mTHP has become challenging due
>>>>>>>>>> to the lack of visibility into its operations. Presenting the
>>>>>>>>>> success rate of mTHP allocations appears to be pressing need.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Recently, I've been experiencing significant difficulty debugging
>>>>>>>>>> performance improvements and regressions without these figures.
>>>>>>>>>> It's crucial for us to understand the true effectiveness of
>>>>>>>>>> mTHP in real-world scenarios, especially in systems with
>>>>>>>>>> fragmented memory.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This patch sets up the framework for per-order mTHP counters,
>>>>>>>>>> starting with the introduction of anon_alloc_success and
>>>>>>>>>> anon_alloc_fail counters. Incorporating additional counters
>>>>>>>>>> should now be straightforward as well.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> -v3:
>>>>>>>>>> * save some memory as order-0 and order-1 can't be THP, Ryan;
>>>>>>>>>> * rename to anon_alloc as right now we only support anon to address
>>>>>>>>>> David's comment;
>>>>>>>>>> * drop a redundant "else", Ryan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> include/linux/huge_mm.h | 18 ++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> mm/huge_memory.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> mm/memory.c | 2 ++
>>>>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>>>>>>>>> index e896ca4760f6..5e9af6be9537 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ extern struct kobj_attribute shmem_enabled_attr;
>>>>>>>>>> * (which is a limitation of the THP implementation).
>>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>>> #define THP_ORDERS_ALL_ANON ((BIT(PMD_ORDER + 1) - 1) & ~(BIT(0)
>>>>>>>>>> | BIT(1)))
>>>>>>>>>> +#define THP_MIN_ORDER 2
>>>>>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>>>>> * Mask of all large folio orders supported for file THP.
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -264,6 +265,23 @@ unsigned long thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct
>>>>>>>>>> vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>>>>>>> enforce_sysfs, orders);
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>> +enum thp_event_item {
>>>>>>>>>> + THP_ANON_ALLOC_SUCCESS,
>>>>>>>>>> + THP_ANON_ALLOC_FAIL,
>>>>>>>>>> + NR_THP_EVENT_ITEMS
>>>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe use a prefix that resembles matches the enum name and is "obviously"
>>>>>>>>> different to the ones in vm_event_item.h, like
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> enum thp_event {
>>>>>>>>> THP_EVENT_ANON_ALLOC_SUCCESS,
>>>>>>>>> THP_EVENT_ANON_ALLOC_FAIL,
>>>>>>>>> __THP_EVENT_COUNT,
>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FWIW, I'd personally replace "event" with "stat". For me "event" only ever
>>>>>>>> increments, but "stat" can increment and decrement. An event is a type of
>>>>>>>> stat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are only adding events for now, but we have identified a need for
>>>>>>>> inc/dec
>>>>>>>> stats that will be added in future.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What about the below?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> enum thp_stat {
>>>>
>>>> It seems we still need to use enum thp_stat_item rather than thp_stat.
>>>> This follows
>>>> enum zone_stat_item
>>>> enum numa_stat_item
>>>> enum node_stat_item
>>
>>
>> Right, we can do that.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> ok.
>>>
>>> Hi David, Ryan,
>>>
>>> I've named everything as follows. Please let me know if you have any further
>>> suggestions before I send the updated version :-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> index e896ca4760f6..cc13fa14aa32 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> @@ -264,6 +264,23 @@ unsigned long thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct
>>> vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> enforce_sysfs, orders);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +enum thp_stat_item {
>>> + THP_STAT_ANON_ALLOC,
>>> + THP_STAT_ANON_ALLOC_FALLBACK,
>>> + __THP_STAT_COUNT
>>> +};
>>> +
>>
>>
>> Final bikeshedding: so we want to call all of that MTHP_, mthp_ etc, to make it
>> clearer that this is per mTHP size?
>
> Perviously we concluded that mTHP was only for commit logs, and in the longer
> term we wanted THP to mean the full set of sizes like it does for hugetlb.
> Neither "mTHP" nor "multi-size THP" currently exist in the code base.
True, but some indication that these are "per THP size" might be reasonable.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-05 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-03 3:55 Barry Song
2024-04-03 8:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-03 11:48 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-03 12:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-03 21:00 ` Barry Song
2024-04-04 7:21 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-04 10:52 ` Barry Song
[not found] ` <30392471-71f9-4eb1-8855-d9c12499346f@redhat.com>
2024-04-05 2:57 ` Barry Song
2024-04-05 4:01 ` Barry Song
2024-04-05 6:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-05 7:21 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-05 9:04 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-04-05 9:24 ` Barry Song
2024-04-05 10:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-05 10:51 ` Barry Song
2024-04-05 7:18 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-05 9:08 ` Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38eee542-8567-4c42-ad63-778b4a20c153@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox