From: "Francis Moreau" <francis.moro@gmail.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: pte_none versus pte_present
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:02:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38b2ab8a0708240202o6570cf55j2d97e45663d8165e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
or call me the dumb question of the day instead...
Sorry for being blind but I cannot see any differences between these 2 helpers.
When should we prefer using one rather the other ?
Thanks for sheding some light !
--
Francis
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2007-08-24 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-24 9:02 Francis Moreau [this message]
2007-08-24 10:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-08-24 19:35 ` Francis Moreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38b2ab8a0708240202o6570cf55j2d97e45663d8165e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=francis.moro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox