From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by annwfn.erfurt.thur.de (8.9.3/8.9.2) with UUCP id SAA29730 for linux-mm@kvack.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:06:01 +0200 Received: from nibiru.pauls.erfurt.thur.de (uucp@localhost) by pauls.erfurt.thur.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with bsmtp id RAA04129 for linux-mm@kvack.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 17:55:27 +0200 Received: from nibiru.pauls.erfurt.thur.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nibiru.pauls.erfurt.thur.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA11790 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 14:58:21 GMT Message-ID: <38DF770C.A5BD2999@nibiru.pauls.erfurt.thur.de> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 14:58:21 +0000 From: Enrico Weigelt Reply-To: weigelt@nibiru.pauls.erfurt.thur.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: what's about /sbin/update ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: hello folks, am i right - the work of bdflush is now kflushd ? (since we have kernel threads) but why do i still have an update(bdflush) running ? correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't bdflush() now only used to configure some parameters of the kflushd and should always return ? bye, ew. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KAMPF GEGEN ECHOLON - DIE USA SCHNEIDED WELTWEIT DEN EMAIL-VERKEHR MIT!!! BITTE ALLE MITMACHEN UND "GEFAEHRLICHE" WOERTER IN DIE SIGNATUR SCHREIBEN ... againstNSAletskillthemallaufstanddollarwirtschaftskrieseusakillthepresident shitfuckingusawewillattacknextweekterrorecholonforkommunismagainstdemocracy. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/