From: Zhouping Liu <zliu@redhat.com>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: memcg: cat: memory.memsw.* : Operation not supported
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 03:39:07 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <389106003.8637801.1358757547754.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FEE7665.6020409@jp.fujitsu.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kamezawa Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> To: "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: "David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>, "Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.cz>, "Zhouping Liu" <zliu@redhat.com>,
> linux-mm@kvack.org, "Li Zefan" <lizefan@huawei.com>, "CAI Qian" <caiqian@redhat.com>, "LKML"
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 11:45:41 AM
> Subject: Re: memcg: cat: memory.memsw.* : Operation not supported
>
> (2012/06/29 3:31), Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, KAME.
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 01:04:16PM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
> >>> I still wish it's folded into CONFIG_MEMCG and conditionalized
> >>> just on
> >>> CONFIG_SWAP tho.
> >>>
> >>
> >> In old days, memsw controller was not very stable. So, we devided
> >> the config.
> >> And, it makes size of memory for swap-device double (adds 2bytes
> >> per swapent.)
> >> That is the problem.
> >
> > I see. Do you think it's now reasonable to drop the separate
> > config
> > option? Having memcg enabled but swap unaccounted sounds
> > half-broken
> > to me.
> >
>
> Hmm. Maybe it's ok if we can keep boot option. I'll cook a patch in
> the next week.
Hello Kame and All,
Sorry for so delay to open the thread. (please open the link https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/26/547 if you don't remember the topic)
do you have any updates for the issue?
I checked the latest version, if we don't open CONFIG_MEMCG_SWAP_ENABLED(commit c255a458055e changed
CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP_ENABLED as CONFIG_MEMCG_SWAP_ENABLED), the issue still exist:
[root@dhcp-8-128 ~] cat .config | grep -i memcg
CONFIG_MEMCG=y
CONFIG_MEMCG_SWAP=y
# CONFIG_MEMCG_SWAP_ENABLED is not set
CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM=y
[root@dhcp-8-128 ~] uname -r
3.8.0-rc4+
[root@dhcp-8-128 ~] cat memory.memsw.*
cat: memory.memsw.failcnt: Operation not supported
cat: memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes: Operation not supported
cat: memory.memsw.max_usage_in_bytes: Operation not supported
cat: memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes: Operation not supported
As David said, we should not export memory.memsw.* files if we disable CONFIG_MEMCG_SWAP_ENABLED, or return -EINVAL, right?
(please correct me if I'm wrong)
--
Thanks,
Zhouping
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-21 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2a1a74bf-fbb5-4a6e-b958-44fff8debff2@zmail13.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2012-06-27 3:49 ` Zhouping Liu
2012-06-27 15:48 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-27 20:04 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-27 20:09 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-27 20:21 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-27 20:24 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-27 20:26 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-28 4:04 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-28 18:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-30 3:45 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-21 8:39 ` Zhouping Liu [this message]
2013-01-21 10:56 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-21 11:12 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-21 13:27 ` Zhouping Liu
2013-01-21 13:46 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-29 7:16 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-28 12:36 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-28 18:29 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-29 0:11 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=389106003.8637801.1358757547754.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
--to=zliu@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox