linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Keppel, Pardo" <pardo.keppel@intel.com>
To: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"mtk.manpages@gmail.com" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Keppel, Pardo" <pardo.keppel@intel.com>
Subject: [patch] mremap.2: Note/clarify "partial completion" on errors
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 23:57:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <388C0EB820381246B2BFD2C7583B3ECBAA1EE1FA@ORSMSX121.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 761 bytes --]

When using mremap() with MREMAP_FIXED and bad parameters, mremap()
returns EINVAL, which is expected; but it also unmaps existing regions
at 'new_address', which surprised me.  I had expected that on EINVAL,
mappings at 'new_address' would remain unmodified.

The current behavior is reasonable, but it was surprising to me, so it might
be surprising to others.  The man page DESCRIPTION currently says:

    "Any previous mapping at the address range specified by new_address
    and new_size is unmapped."

It would be clearer to me if it also said something like:

   "Previous mappings may be unmapped even if mremap() returns an error."

And/or if ERRORS said something about this behavior.

A sample patch for man2/mremap.2 is attached.

[-- Attachment #2: mremap.2.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 788 bytes --]

diff --git a/man2/mremap.2 b/man2/mremap.2
index d73fb64fa..f6408a5c9 100644
--- a/man2/mremap.2
+++ b/man2/mremap.2
@@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ Any previous mapping at the address range specified by
 and
 .I new_size
 is unmapped.
+Previous mappings may be unmapped even if
+.BR mremap ()
+returns an error.
 If
 .B MREMAP_FIXED
 is specified, then
@@ -148,6 +151,16 @@ On error, the value
 (that is, \fI(void\ *)\ \-1\fP) is returned,
 and \fIerrno\fP is set appropriately.
 .SH ERRORS
+On errors,
+.BR mremap ()
+may perform
+.I partial completion
+where some but not all side-effects occur.
+For example, with
+.BR MREMAP_FIXED ,
+mappings at
+.B new_address
+may be unmapped, with no new mappings to replace them.
 .TP
 .B EAGAIN
 The caller tried to expand a memory segment that is locked,

                 reply	other threads:[~2019-08-27 23:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=388C0EB820381246B2BFD2C7583B3ECBAA1EE1FA@ORSMSX121.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=pardo.keppel@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox