From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: Hrushikesh Salunke <hsalunke@amd.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, jackmanb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
ziy@nvidia.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rkodsara@amd.com, bharata@amd.com, ankur.a.arora@oracle.com,
shivankg@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: use batch page clearing in kernel_init_pages()
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:27:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <378ae036-6559-4b81-9bac-c8f0b73e1c98@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421042451.76918-1-hsalunke@amd.com>
On 4/21/26 06:24, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote:
> When init_on_alloc is enabled, kernel_init_pages() clears every page
> one at a time via clear_highpage_kasan_tagged(), which incurs per-page
> kmap_local_page()/kunmap_local() overhead and prevents the architecture
> clearing primitive from operating on contiguous ranges.
>
> Introduce clear_highpages_kasan_tagged() in highmem.h, a batch
> clearing helper that calls clear_pages() for the full contiguous range
> on !HIGHMEM systems, bypassing the per-page kmap overhead and allowing
> a single invocation of the arch clearing primitive across the entire
> allocation. The HIGHMEM path falls back to per-page clearing since
> those pages require kmap.
>
> Use it in kernel_init_pages() to replace the per-page loop.
>
> Allocating 8192 x 2MB HugeTLB pages (16GB) with init_on_alloc=1:
>
> Before: 0.445s
> After: 0.166s (-62.7%, 2.68x faster)
>
> Kernel time (sys) reduction per workload with init_on_alloc=1:
>
> Workload Before After Change
> Graph500 64C128T 30m 41.8s 15m 14.8s -50.3%
> Graph500 16C32T 15m 56.7s 9m 43.7s -39.0%
> Pagerank 32T 1m 58.5s 1m 12.8s -38.5%
> Pagerank 128T 2m 36.3s 1m 40.4s -35.7%
>
> Signed-off-by: Hrushikesh Salunke <hsalunke@amd.com>
> ---
> base commit: f1541b40cd422d7e22273be9b7e9edfc9ea4f0d7
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260408092441.435133-1-hsalunke@amd.com/
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Dropped cond_resched() and PROCESS_PAGES_NON_PREEMPT_BATCH as
> kernel_init_pages() runs inside the page allocator and can be
> called from atomic context, making cond_resched() unsafe. The
> original code never had a cond_resched() here, and the
> performance gain comes from batching, not rescheduling.
>
> - Moved the !HIGHMEM/HIGHMEM branching into a new
> clear_highpages_kasan_tagged() helper in highmem.h, per David's
> suggestion.
>
> include/linux/highmem.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +----
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/highmem.h b/include/linux/highmem.h
> index af03db851a1d..ad0f42d06ce6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/highmem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/highmem.h
> @@ -345,6 +345,18 @@ static inline void clear_highpage_kasan_tagged(struct page *page)
> kunmap_local(kaddr);
> }
>
> +static inline void clear_highpages_kasan_tagged(struct page *page, int numpages)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM)) {
> + clear_pages(kasan_reset_tag(page_address(page)), numpages);
> + } else {
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < numpages; i++)
> + clear_highpage_kasan_tagged(page + i);
> + }
> +}
> +
> #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_TAG_CLEAR_HIGHPAGES
>
> /* Return false to let people know we did not initialize the pages */
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index b1c5430cad4e..1aaf7f839ff4 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1220,12 +1220,9 @@ static inline bool should_skip_kasan_poison(struct page *page)
>
> static void kernel_init_pages(struct page *page, int numpages)
> {
> - int i;
> -
> /* s390's use of memset() could override KASAN redzones. */
> kasan_disable_current();
> - for (i = 0; i < numpages; i++)
> - clear_highpage_kasan_tagged(page + i);
> + clear_highpages_kasan_tagged(page, numpages);
> kasan_enable_current();
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-21 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 4:24 Hrushikesh Salunke
2026-04-21 9:27 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=378ae036-6559-4b81-9bac-c8f0b73e1c98@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hsalunke@amd.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rkodsara@amd.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shivankg@amd.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox