From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>, "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm/gup: remove get_user_pages_locked()
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:01:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37484a02-9e64-ea20-314a-a65759b138d2@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220131120557.rwde6sphc245pzu7@quack3.lan>
On 1/31/22 04:05, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sun 30-01-22 21:17:52, John Hubbard wrote:
>> Unraveling the rat's nest set of APIs in mm/gup.c a bit more.
>> get_user_pages_locked() was not helping at all, so remove it.
>>
>> Also, lookup_node() has only a single caller, but it is still worth
>> having a clearer locking policy there. Changing it so that the caller
>> both takes and releases the mmap_lock, thus leaving lookup_node() with
>> the sole job of translating a virtual address into a numa node ID.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
>
> Well, the point of _locked() GUP variants is that we can unlock mmap_sem
> when reading a page from the disk during a page fault (hidden behind
> VM_FAULT_RETRY). So as such _locked() variants are about reducing mmap_sem
> latency rather than code readability. In this particular case, I don't
> think using _locked() variant in lookup_node() is very beneficial
> (generally I would not expect to take a fault there) but at least a
> justification in the commit message should be different :).
>
> Honza
I'll rewrite this commit description to cover this point properly.
Jason also suggested using gup-fast, which I like.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-31 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-31 5:17 [PATCH 0/4] mm/gup: some cleanups John Hubbard
2022-01-31 5:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: Fix invalid page pointer returned with FOLL_PIN gups John Hubbard
2022-02-02 14:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-31 5:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/gup: clean up follow_pfn_pte() slightly John Hubbard
2022-01-31 13:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-31 5:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/gup: remove unused pin_user_pages_locked() John Hubbard
2022-01-31 14:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-31 14:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-02-02 14:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-31 5:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/gup: remove get_user_pages_locked() John Hubbard
2022-01-31 12:05 ` Jan Kara
2022-01-31 20:01 ` John Hubbard [this message]
2022-01-31 13:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-31 20:01 ` John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37484a02-9e64-ea20-314a-a65759b138d2@nvidia.com \
--to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox