From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
"Jason@zx2c4.com" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"pedro.falcato@gmail.com" <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] minmax: reduce compilation time
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:21:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36aa2cad-1db1-4abf-8dd2-fb20484aabc3@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <137646a7-7017-490d-be78-5bd5627609c3@lucifer.local>
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 07:56:31PM GMT, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 11:24:09AM GMT, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 11:13, Lorenzo Stoakes
> > <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > 5,447,539 ./arch/x86/xen/setup.o.pre
> >
> > Can you perhaps do some kind of "max expansion" on all the
> > preprocessor files (you seem to have done it by changing the ".c.o"
> > rule to just spit it out as "o.pre", which sounds fine).
>
> Yeah I simply hacked in a gcc -E, ugly but effective, e.g. prepending
> cmd_cc_o_c in scripts/Makefile.build with:
>
> cmd_cc_o_c = $(CC) $(c_flags) -E $< > $@.pre; \
>
> (with credit to Arnd, who came up with a timing patch using a similar
> technique, I just super trivially adapted to do this instead).
>
> I therefore generate a bunch of .pre files, + run this to get total
> numbers:
>
> find . -iname '*.pre' -exec du -cb {} + | grep total$ | cut -f1 | paste -sd+ - | bc
>
> So I have the numbers for all of the files. Did you want me to post the
> numbers somewhere, or were you after someting cleverer, not sure what you
> mean by "max expansion"?
>
> >
> > For example, this trivial patch seems to fix the setup.c expansion by
> > about an order of magnitude (ie 50M -> 5M).
> >
> > Entirely untested, but looks ObviouslyCorrect(tm) to me.
> >
> > Linus
> >
> > Linus
>
> Yeah this has a big impact, with just this patch we go from 51,407,944 to
> 4,351,747 locally for me, so match your results.
>
> Patch looks obviously correct to me, I wonder if we should just apply that
> now and take out one of the worst offenders while we figure out how to fix
> the broader problem?
>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> fwiw on that :)
A simple comparison pre-revert vs. post-revert gives some ideas for other
low-hanging fruit:
389180./drivers/block/loop.o.pre
409741./net/ipv4/tcp_output.o.pre
462230./net/ipv4/tcp_input.o.pre
470714./mm/page_alloc.o.pre
570698./block/bio.o.pre
600206./net/ipv6/proc.o.pre
761333./arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.o.pre
1315265./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.o.pre
1334256./mm/compaction.o.pre
45960405./arch/x86/xen/setup.o.pre
I might try an allmodconfig with David's patches to see if that pulls out any
other really obvious cases.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-26 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-24 14:26 David Laight
2024-07-24 14:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] minmax: Put all the clamp() definitions together David Laight
2024-07-24 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] minmax: Use _Static_assert() instead of static_assert() David Laight
2024-07-24 14:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] compiler.h: Add __if_constexpr(expr, if_const, if_not_const) David Laight
2024-07-24 17:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-25 9:12 ` David Laight
2024-07-24 19:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-25 8:45 ` David Laight
2024-07-24 14:30 ` [PATCH 4/7] minmax: Simplify signedness check David Laight
2024-07-24 16:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-24 20:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-25 9:00 ` David Laight
2024-07-25 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-26 9:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 12:57 ` David Laight
2024-07-26 13:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-25 13:24 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-25 16:39 ` David Laight
2024-07-24 14:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] minmax: Factor out the zero-extension logic from umin/umax David Laight
2024-07-24 14:32 ` [PATCH 6/7] minmax: Optimise _Static_assert() check in clamp() David Laight
2024-07-24 14:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] minmax: minmax: Add __types_ok3() and optimise defines with 3 arguments David Laight
2024-07-24 17:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-25 9:07 ` David Laight
2024-07-24 19:34 ` [PATCH 0/7] minmax: reduce compilation time Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-24 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-26 18:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 18:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-26 18:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 19:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2024-07-26 21:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-26 21:46 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-26 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27 15:30 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-27 15:38 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-27 16:31 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 16:36 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-27 16:41 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 16:52 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-27 16:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-28 11:32 ` David Laight
2024-07-27 4:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27 4:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27 8:08 ` David Laight
2024-07-27 18:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-28 11:17 ` David Laight
2024-07-28 13:07 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 17:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-27 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27 8:07 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 16:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27 18:44 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-30 4:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-30 10:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-28 17:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-07-28 18:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 21:32 ` David Laight
2024-07-26 21:38 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36aa2cad-1db1-4abf-8dd2-fb20484aabc3@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=pedro.falcato@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox