linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,  lhenriques@suse.com,
	cmaiolino@redhat.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check for sleepable context in kvfree
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:52:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3622a5fe9f13ddfd15b262dbeda700a26c395c2a.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190723131212.445-1-jlayton@kernel.org>

On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 09:12 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> A lot of callers of kvfree only go down the vfree path under very rare
> circumstances, and so may never end up hitting the might_sleep_if in it.
> Ensure that when kvfree is called, that it is operating in a context
> where it is allowed to sleep.
> 
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
>  mm/util.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 

FWIW, I started looking at this after Luis sent me some ceph patches
that fixed a few of these problems. I have not done extensive testing
with this patch, so maybe consider this an RFC for now.

HCH points out that xfs uses kvfree as a generic "free this no matter
what it is" sort of wrapper and expects the callers to work out whether
they might be freeing a vmalloc'ed address. If that sort of usage turns
out to be prevalent, then we may need another approach to clean this up.

> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index e6351a80f248..81ec2a003c86 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -482,6 +482,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvmalloc_node);
>   */
>  void kvfree(const void *addr)
>  {
> +	might_sleep_if(!in_interrupt());
> +
>  	if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr))
>  		vfree(addr);
>  	else

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-23 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-23 13:12 Jeff Layton
2019-07-23 17:52 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2019-07-23 17:55   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-07-23 18:05     ` Jeff Layton
2019-07-23 18:11       ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-07-23 18:19         ` Jeff Layton
2019-07-23 18:29           ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3622a5fe9f13ddfd15b262dbeda700a26c395c2a.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=lhenriques@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox