From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, lhenriques@suse.com,
cmaiolino@redhat.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check for sleepable context in kvfree
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:52:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3622a5fe9f13ddfd15b262dbeda700a26c395c2a.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190723131212.445-1-jlayton@kernel.org>
On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 09:12 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> A lot of callers of kvfree only go down the vfree path under very rare
> circumstances, and so may never end up hitting the might_sleep_if in it.
> Ensure that when kvfree is called, that it is operating in a context
> where it is allowed to sleep.
>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/util.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
FWIW, I started looking at this after Luis sent me some ceph patches
that fixed a few of these problems. I have not done extensive testing
with this patch, so maybe consider this an RFC for now.
HCH points out that xfs uses kvfree as a generic "free this no matter
what it is" sort of wrapper and expects the callers to work out whether
they might be freeing a vmalloc'ed address. If that sort of usage turns
out to be prevalent, then we may need another approach to clean this up.
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index e6351a80f248..81ec2a003c86 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -482,6 +482,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvmalloc_node);
> */
> void kvfree(const void *addr)
> {
> + might_sleep_if(!in_interrupt());
> +
> if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr))
> vfree(addr);
> else
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-23 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-23 13:12 Jeff Layton
2019-07-23 17:52 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2019-07-23 17:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-07-23 18:05 ` Jeff Layton
2019-07-23 18:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-07-23 18:19 ` Jeff Layton
2019-07-23 18:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3622a5fe9f13ddfd15b262dbeda700a26c395c2a.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=lhenriques@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox