From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AB1CA9EA0 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AD8205ED for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:56:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A8AD8205ED Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5B96F6B0003; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 07:56:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5426A6B0006; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 07:56:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 409476B0007; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 07:56:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0168.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.168]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190B36B0003 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 07:56:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 89EFD8249980 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:56:19 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76071267678.06.doll41_3716faf2d8c3e X-HE-Tag: doll41_3716faf2d8c3e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2948 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by imf40.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:56:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Oct 2019 04:56:17 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,326,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="191437251" Received: from ddalessa-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.201.232]) ([10.254.201.232]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 22 Oct 2019 04:56:15 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH hmm 00/15] Consolidate the mmu notifier interval_tree and locking To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Jerome Glisse , Ralph Campbell , John Hubbard , "Felix.Kuehling@amd.com" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrea Arcangeli , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , Ben Skeggs References: <20191015181242.8343-1-jgg@ziepe.ca> <5fdbcda8-c6ec-70aa-3f89-147fe67152f2@intel.com> <20191021165828.GA6285@mellanox.com> From: Dennis Dalessandro Message-ID: <35d803f3-a24a-8a5f-745b-52c2f9876b7c@intel.com> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 07:56:12 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191021165828.GA6285@mellanox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 10/21/2019 12:58 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:55:51AM -0400, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: >> On 10/15/2019 2:12 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>> This is still being tested, but I figured to send it to start getting help >>> from the xen, amd and hfi drivers which I cannot test here. >> >> Sorry for the delay, I never seen this. Was not on Cc list and didn't >> register to me it impacted hfi. I'll take a look and run it through some >> hfi1 tests. > > Hm, you were cc'd on the hfi1 patch of the series: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11191395/ > > So you saw that, right? I do now. > But it seems that git send-email didn't pull all the cc's together? I don't know. I thought it did, at one time I recall trying to get it *not* to do that, when preparing some internal reviews. Haven't used it for a long time though, I've been using stgit. At any rate can you give me a SHA or branch this applies on top of? I have pulled rdma/hmm, rdma/wip/jgg, linus/master but seem to have conflicts. -Denny