From: "Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@sonymobile.com>
To: 'Russell King - ARM Linux' <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: 'Ard Biesheuvel' <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
'Will Deacon' <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'akinobu.mita@gmail.com'" <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>,
"'linux-mm@kvack.org'" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
'Joe Perches' <joe@perches.com>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC V6 2/3] arm:add bitrev.h file to support rbit instruction
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 20:40:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103EDAF89E198@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150109111048.GE12302@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux@arm.linux.org.uk]
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 7:11 PM
> To: Wang, Yalin
> Cc: 'Ard Biesheuvel'; 'Will Deacon'; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org';
> 'akinobu.mita@gmail.com'; 'linux-mm@kvack.org'; 'Joe Perches'; 'linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org'
> Subject: Re: [RFC V6 2/3] arm:add bitrev.h file to support rbit instruction
>
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 10:16:32AM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux@arm.linux.org.uk]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 2:41 AM
> > > To: Wang, Yalin
> > > Cc: 'Will Deacon'; 'Ard Biesheuvel'; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org';
> > > 'akinobu.mita@gmail.com'; 'linux-mm@kvack.org'; 'Joe Perches';
> > > 'linux-arm- kernel@lists.infradead.org'
> > > Subject: Re: [RFC V6 2/3] arm:add bitrev.h file to support rbit
> > > instruction
> > >
> > > The root cause is that the kernel being built is supposed to support
> > > both
> > > ARMv7 and ARMv6K CPUs. However, "rbit" is only available on
> > > ARMv6T2 (thumb2) and ARMv7, and not plain ARMv6 or ARMv6K CPUs.
> > >
> > In the patch that you applied:
> > 8205/1 add bitrev.h file to support rbit instruction
> >
> > I have add :
> > + select HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE if ((CPU_V7M || CPU_V7) && !CPU_V6)
> >
> > If you build kernel support ARMv6K, should CONFIG_CPU_V6=y, isn't it ?
> > Then will not build hardware rbit instruction, isn't it ?
>
> The config has:
>
> CONFIG_CPU_PJ4=y
> # CONFIG_CPU_V6 is not set
> CONFIG_CPU_V6K=y
> CONFIG_CPU_V7=y
> CONFIG_CPU_32v6=y
> CONFIG_CPU_32v6K=y
> CONFIG_CPU_32v7=y
>
> And no, the CONFIG_CPU_V* flags refer to the CPUs. The
> CONFIG_CPU_32v* symbols refer to the CPU architectures.
>
Oh, I see,
How about change like this:
+ select HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE if ((CPU_V7M || CPU_V7) && !CPU_V6 && !CPU_V6K)
I am not sure if I also need add some older CPU types like !CPU_ARM9TDMI && !CPU_ARM940T ?
Another solution is:
+ select HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE if ((CPU_32V7M || CPU_32V7) && !CPU_32V6 && !CPU_32V5 && !CPU_32V4 && !CPU_32V4T && !CPU_32V3)
By the way, I am not clear about the difference between CPU_V6 and CPU_V6K, could you tell me? :)
Thank you
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-24 5:10 [PATCH RFC] arm/arm64:add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE to support rbit Wang, Yalin
2014-10-27 6:37 ` [RFC V2] arm/arm64:add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE to support rbit instruction Wang, Yalin
2014-10-27 6:46 ` Joe Perches
2014-10-27 7:13 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-10-28 21:18 ` [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8 Joe Perches
2014-10-28 21:22 ` [PATCH] 6fire: " Joe Perches
2014-10-29 2:42 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-10-29 3:06 ` Joe Perches
2014-10-29 3:10 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-10-29 3:28 ` [RFC V2] arm/arm64:add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE to support rbit instruction Rob Herring
2014-10-29 5:14 ` [RFC V4 1/3] add " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-29 5:15 ` [RFC V4 2/3] arm:add bitrev.h file " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-29 5:16 ` [RFC V4 3/3] arm64:add " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-29 5:50 ` [RFC V5 1/3] add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-29 5:51 ` [RFC V5 2/3] arm:add bitrev.h file " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-29 5:52 ` [RFC V5 3/3] arm64:add " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-30 12:01 ` Will Deacon
2014-10-30 12:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2014-10-31 5:40 ` [RFC V6 1/3] add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-31 5:40 ` [RFC V6 2/3] " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-31 5:42 ` [RFC V6 2/3] arm:add bitrev.h file " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-31 7:40 ` [RFC] arm:remove clear_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE) Wang, Yalin
2014-10-31 7:45 ` Joe Perches
2014-10-31 7:51 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-10-31 7:58 ` Joe Perches
2014-10-31 7:59 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-10-31 8:01 ` [RFC V2] " Wang, Yalin
2014-11-13 23:53 ` [RFC V6 2/3] arm:add bitrev.h file to support rbit instruction Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-11-14 0:05 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-14 0:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-11-14 0:45 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-14 1:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-11-14 1:26 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-14 9:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-11-14 6:37 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-11-14 6:55 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-14 7:03 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-11-14 2:01 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-11-14 9:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-11-17 2:38 ` Wang, Yalin
2015-01-08 18:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-09 2:16 ` Wang, Yalin
2015-01-09 11:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-09 12:40 ` Wang, Yalin [this message]
2015-01-14 16:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 1:42 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-10-31 7:54 ` [RFC V6 2/3] add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-31 5:41 ` [RFC V6 3/3] arm64:add bitrev.h file " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-31 10:43 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-03 2:17 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-11-03 8:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-11-03 9:50 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-04 1:45 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-10-31 2:03 ` [RFC V5 " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-29 5:21 ` [RFC V4 1/3] add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE " Joe Perches
2014-10-29 5:36 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-10-29 5:20 ` [RFC V2] arm/arm64:add " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-27 8:02 ` [RFC V3] " Wang, Yalin
2014-10-27 10:48 ` Will Deacon
2014-10-28 1:34 ` Wang, Yalin
2014-10-28 13:59 ` Will Deacon
2014-10-29 2:52 ` Wang, Yalin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103EDAF89E198@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net \
--to=yalin.wang@sonymobile.com \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox