From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] mm: khugepaged: make scan loops suspend aware
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:44:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3571cf8b-9fb3-41b2-a402-a8537ee2c399@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jftqdosilzfkd4ku6pjuevkvuwmhlqtua62jwsmmgdfcseitb4@gopt2xzqhyrk>
On 2/12/26 07:32, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (26/02/11 10:50), David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> On 2/11/26 04:15, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>>> A number of khugepaaged's loops, e.g. khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(),
>>> are time unbound, which can become problematic during system
>>> suspend:
>>>
>>> PM: suspend entry (s2idle)
>>> Filesystems sync: 0.003 seconds
>>> Freezing user space processes
>>> Freezing user space processes completed (elapsed 0.003 seconds)
>>> OOM killer disabled.
>>> Freezing remaining freezable tasks
>>> Freezing remaining freezable tasks failed after 20.004 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
>>> task:khugepaged state:D stack:0 pid:1345 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000
>>> Call Trace:
>>> <TASK>
>>> schedule+0x523/0x16a0
>>> schedule_timeout+0x23b/0x6e0
>>> io_schedule_timeout+0x3f/0x80
>>> wait_for_completion_io_timeout+0xe4/0x170
>>> submit_bio_wait+0x79/0xc0
>>> swap_readpage+0x150/0x2d0
>>> swap_cluster_readahead+0x3be/0x750
>>> shmem_swapin+0xa7/0x100
>>> shmem_swapin_folio+0xcd/0x2e0
>>> shmem_get_folio+0x237/0x580
>>> collapse_file+0x247/0x1280
>>> hpage_collapse_scan_file+0x26e/0x380
>>> khugepaged+0x43b/0x810
>>> kthread+0xfb/0x120
>>> </TASK>
>>>
>>> Make hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable() suspend aware so
>>> that khugepaaged's scan loops can terminate in a timely manner
>>> and let system enter the sleep state.
>>>
>>
>> Do we want a Fixes: tag, and maybe backport this to stable kernels?
>
> I can Cc stable, but I don't know about Fixes - we are adding something
> that was never there, not fixing a regression.
Cc: stable is only possible with a valid Fixes:.
If we're fixing an issue, we usually try to identify which commit introduced the
issue.
For example, support for freezing was introduced in
commit 878aee7d6b5504e01b9caffce080e792b6b8d090
Author: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jan 13 15:47:10 2011 -0800
thp: freeze khugepaged and ksmd
It's unclear why schedule friendly kernel threads can't be taken away by
the CPU through the scheduler itself. It's safer to stop them as they can
trigger memory allocation, if kswapd also freezes itself to avoid
generating I/O they have too.
Now that I am looking through the history, I find:
commit b39ca208403c8f2c17dab1fbfef1f5ecaff25e53
Author: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Dec 20 07:17:53 2023 +0800
mm/khugepaged: remove redundant try_to_freeze()
A freezable kernel thread can enter frozen state during freezing by either
calling try_to_freeze() or using wait_event_freezable() and its variants.
However, there is no need to use both methods simultaneously. The
freezable wait variants have been used in khugepaged_wait_work() and
khugepaged_alloc_sleep(), so remove this redundant try_to_freeze().
I used the following stress-ng command to generate some memory load on my
Intel Alder Lake board (24 CPUs, 32G memory).
I wonder if that made the issue more likely to appear?
Interestingly, we also had in the past:
commit 1dfb059b9438633b0546c5431538a47f6ed99028
Author: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Dec 8 14:33:57 2011 -0800
thp: reduce khugepaged freezing latency
khugepaged can sometimes cause suspend to fail, requiring that the user
retry the suspend operation.
So it's a recurring theme.
Given that we only scan "khugepaged_pages_to_scan" pages/ptes/etc. before going back to sleep,
I wonder how that can take in your setup that long.
Why does it end up taking something around 20 seconds in your setup? How is khugepaged_pages_to_scan
set in your environment?
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-12 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-11 3:15 Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-02-11 6:15 ` Nico Pache
2026-02-12 1:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-02-11 9:50 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-12 1:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-02-12 8:30 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-12 8:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-02-12 6:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-02-12 8:44 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-02-12 9:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-02-12 9:10 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-12 9:24 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-02-14 6:35 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-16 9:24 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-16 9:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-02-16 10:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3571cf8b-9fb3-41b2-a402-a8537ee2c399@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox