linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] PM / Runtime: introduce pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio()
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 22:46:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3562840.kvm4ZTnunM@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5434404.G1ERYjuorE@vostro.rjw.lan>

On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 10:19:29 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, November 24, 2012 08:59:14 PM Ming Lei wrote:
> > The patch introduces the flag of memalloc_noio in 'struct dev_pm_info'
> > to help PM core to teach mm not allocating memory with GFP_KERNEL
> > flag for avoiding probable deadlock.
> > 
> > As explained in the comment, any GFP_KERNEL allocation inside
> > runtime_resume() or runtime_suspend() on any one of device in
> > the path from one block or network device to the root device
> > in the device tree may cause deadlock, the introduced
> > pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio() sets or clears the flag on
> > device in the path recursively.
> > 
> > Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> > ---
> > v5:
> > 	- fix code style error
> > 	- add comment on clear the device memalloc_noio flag
> > v4:
> > 	- rename memalloc_noio_resume as memalloc_noio
> > 	- remove pm_runtime_get_memalloc_noio()
> > 	- add comments on pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio
> > v3:
> > 	- introduce pm_runtime_get_memalloc_noio()
> > 	- hold one global lock on pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio
> > 	- hold device power lock when accessing memalloc_noio_resume
> > 	  flag suggested by Alan Stern
> > 	- implement pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio without recursion
> > 	  suggested by Alan Stern
> > v2:
> > 	- introduce pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio()
> > ---
> >  drivers/base/power/runtime.c |   60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/pm.h           |    1 +
> >  include/linux/pm_runtime.h   |    3 +++
> >  3 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > index 3148b10..3e198a0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > @@ -124,6 +124,66 @@ unsigned long pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration(struct device *dev)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration);
> >  
> > +static int dev_memalloc_noio(struct device *dev, void *data)
> > +{
> > +	return dev->power.memalloc_noio;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio - Set a device's memalloc_noio flag.
> > + * @dev: Device to handle.
> > + * @enable: True for setting the flag and False for clearing the flag.
> > + *
> > + * Set the flag for all devices in the path from the device to the
> > + * root device in the device tree if @enable is true, otherwise clear
> > + * the flag for devices in the path whose siblings don't set the flag.
> > + *
> 
> Please use counters instead of walking the whole path every time.  Ie. in
> addition to the flag add a counter to store the number of the device's
> children having that flag set.

I would use the flag only to store the information that
pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio(dev, true) has been run for this device directly
and I'd use a counter for everything else.

That is, have power.memalloc_count that would be incremented when (1)
pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio(dev, true) is called for that device and (2) when
power.memalloc_count for one of its children changes from 0 to 1 (and
analogously for decrementation).  Then, check the counter in rpm_callback().

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-27 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-24 12:59 [PATCH v6 0/6] solve deadlock caused by memory allocation with I/O Ming Lei
2012-11-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] mm: teach mm by current context info to not do I/O during memory allocation Ming Lei
2012-11-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] PM / Runtime: introduce pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio() Ming Lei
2012-11-27 21:19   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-27 21:46     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-11-28  3:57     ` Ming Lei
2012-11-28 10:06       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28 13:51         ` Ming Lei
2012-11-28  4:34     ` Ming Lei
2012-11-28  9:29       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28  9:47         ` Ming Lei
2012-11-28 10:15           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] block/genhd.c: apply pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio on block devices Ming Lei
2012-11-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] net/core: apply pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio on network devices Ming Lei
2012-11-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] PM / Runtime: force memory allocation with no I/O during Runtime PM callbcack Ming Lei
2012-11-27 21:24   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28  3:06     ` Ming Lei
2012-11-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] USB: forbid memory allocation with I/O during bus reset Ming Lei
2012-11-27 20:25 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] solve deadlock caused by memory allocation with I/O Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3562840.kvm4ZTnunM@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.de \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox