linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	<sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
	<bp@alien8.de>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>,
	<mawupeng1@huawei.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	<linmiaohe@huawei.com>, <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	<james.morse@arm.com>, <tongtiangen@huawei.com>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, <justin.he@arm.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>,
	<ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>, <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
	<baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
	<robert.moore@intel.com>, <lvying6@huawei.com>,
	<xiexiuqi@huawei.com>, <zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v18 1/2] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if synchronous memory error not recovered
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:48:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <353809e7-5373-0d54-6ddb-767bc5af9e5f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <709ee8d2-8969-424c-b32b-101c6a8220fb@linux.alibaba.com>

On 2025/4/14 23:02, Shuai Xue wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2025/4/14 22:37, Hanjun Guo 写道:
>> On 2025/4/4 19:20, Shuai Xue wrote:
>>> Synchronous error was detected as a result of user-space process 
>>> accessing
>>> a 2-bit uncorrected error. The CPU will take a synchronous error 
>>> exception
>>> such as Synchronous External Abort (SEA) on Arm64. The kernel will 
>>> queue a
>>> memory_failure() work which poisons the related page, unmaps the 
>>> page, and
>>> then sends a SIGBUS to the process, so that a system wide panic can be
>>> avoided.
>>>
>>> However, no memory_failure() work will be queued when abnormal 
>>> synchronous
>>> errors occur. These errors can include situations such as invalid PA,
>>> unexpected severity, no memory failure config support, invalid GUID
>>> section, etc. In such case, the user-space process will trigger SEA 
>>> again.
>>> This loop can potentially exceed the platform firmware threshold or even
>>> trigger a kernel hard lockup, leading to a system reboot.
>>>
>>> Fix it by performing a force kill if no memory_failure() work is queued
>>> for synchronous errors.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>>> index b72772494655..50e4d924aa8b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>>> @@ -799,6 +799,17 @@ static bool ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>>>           }
>>>       }
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * If no memory failure work is queued for abnormal synchronous
>>> +     * errors, do a force kill.
>>> +     */
>>> +    if (sync && !queued) {
>>> +        dev_err(ghes->dev,
>>> +            HW_ERR GHES_PFX "%s:%d: synchronous unrecoverable error 
>>> (SIGBUS)\n",
>>> +            current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
>>> +        force_sig(SIGBUS);
>>> +    }
>>
>> I think it's reasonable to send a force kill to the task when the
>> synchronous memory error is not recovered.
>>
>> But I hope this code will not trigger some legacy firmware issues,
>> let's be careful for this, so can we just introduce arch specific
>> callbacks for this?
> 
> Sorry, can you give more details? I am not sure I got your point.
> 
> For x86, Tony confirmed that ghes will not dispatch x86 synchronous errors
> (a.k.a machine check exception), in previous vesion.
> Sync is only used in arm64 platform, see is_hest_sync_notify().

Sorry for the late reply, from the code I can see that x86 will reuse
ghes_do_proc(), if Tony confirmed that x86 is OK, it's OK to me as well.

Thanks
Hanjun


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-18  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-04 11:20 [RESEND PATCH v18 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous errors in task work Shuai Xue
2025-04-04 11:20 ` [RESEND PATCH v18 1/2] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if synchronous memory error not recovered Shuai Xue
2025-04-14 14:37   ` Hanjun Guo
2025-04-14 15:02     ` Shuai Xue
2025-04-18  7:48       ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2025-04-18 12:35         ` Shuai Xue
2025-04-25  1:00           ` Hanjun Guo
2025-04-25  1:10             ` Shuai Xue
2025-04-28 15:23               ` Will Deacon
2025-05-14  1:35                 ` Shuai Xue
2025-07-01 11:00                 ` Shuai Xue
2025-07-01 13:56                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-07-14 11:54                     ` Shuai Xue
2025-07-14 17:30                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-07-15  2:03                         ` Shuai Xue
2025-07-15  2:46                         ` Hanjun Guo
2025-07-15 12:06                         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-07-15 12:40                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-04 11:20 ` [RESEND PATCH v18 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2025-04-14 14:48   ` Hanjun Guo
2025-04-14 14:56     ` Shuai Xue
2025-04-08  2:34 ` [RESEND PATCH v18 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous errors " Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=353809e7-5373-0d54-6ddb-767bc5af9e5f@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=lvying6@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mawupeng1@huawei.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tanxiaofei@huawei.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tongtiangen@huawei.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox