From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FF7C433F5 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 01:08:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id CBD9C6B0072; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 20:08:32 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C6C3E6B0074; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 20:08:32 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B0D5A6B0075; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 20:08:32 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0155.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.155]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14E76B0072 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 20:08:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6873F88498 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 01:08:22 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78874697244.22.1DA5C4C Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA183000109 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 01:08:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76920B82025; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 01:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C80DAC00446; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 01:08:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1638493699; bh=GgJPejWHjB1hO23ZneIa2/JVxaKv5F32MA6/BnqDTaQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=mDPTRUte24dhMbvhYFICRGrHBprMS5iBPUmuKQp9y0yZLj7JSJLl9cKa135lOqdZI 7JMd6VR1H0RJMCcityYODsMs3xqyTmpQ2w1ga7d5u6C2YgqYaK9qOBEqIOt50xg2R6 bdy8sMyG1cMe+P7NKykT1HJXw23ujt9DhsVvchdu1F0EVSB5e091Ko3PBXbFtS/A5l ojnLUhEwSnPqireq9bSfbRnUfukDUQh2+S4kuidHuYVhhEkKcnmbMzM1dSvcWl/9uy YYMvqhk0IQyCsEwMK/86Y+JYN+Pv48XBxaI6Uda549qxuY/USvoklOq4tePWLmEZtT MfzVXzzz+Mzzg== Message-ID: <34ffef96-a4d4-d16c-37a5-3c732f0a7a20@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 17:08:16 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 00/13] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM guest private memory Content-Language: en-US To: Chao Peng , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , Hugh Dickins , Jeff Layton , "J . Bruce Fields" , Andrew Morton , Yu Zhang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , john.ji@intel.com, susie.li@intel.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com References: <20211119134739.20218-1-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> From: Andy Lutomirski In-Reply-To: <20211119134739.20218-1-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: 9jzqo86j8h5oh87uxguim4bbp6hnqxnn Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=mDPTRUte; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of luto@kernel.org designates 145.40.68.75 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=luto@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1FA183000109 X-HE-Tag: 1638493701-437485 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 11/19/21 05:47, Chao Peng wrote: > This RFC series try to implement the fd-based KVM guest private memory > proposal described at [1] and an improved 'New Proposal' described at [2]. I generally like this. Thanks!