From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>, Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mm,slub: Do not special case N_NORMAL nodes for slab_nodes
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:33:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34584ae6-473d-4cf8-923c-3a8e7f16e8ad@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250603110850.192912-2-osalvador@suse.de>
On 03.06.25 13:08, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> Currently, slab_mem_going_going_callback() checks whether the node has
> N_NORMAL memory in order to be set in slab_nodes.
> While it is true that gettind rid of that enforcing would mean
> ending up with movables nodes in slab_nodes, the memory waste that comes
> with that is negligible.
>
> So stop checking for status_change_nid_normal and just use status_change_nid
> instead which works for both types of memory.
>
> Also, once we allocate the kmem_cache_node cache for the node in
> slab_mem_online_callback(), we never deallocate it in
> slab_mem_off_callback() when the node goes memoryless, so we can just
> get rid of it.
>
> The side effects are that we will stop clearing the node from slab_nodes,
> and also that newly created kmem caches after node hotremove will now allocate
> their kmem_cache_node for the node(s) that was hotremoved, but these
> should be negligible.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-04 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-03 11:08 [PATCH v4 0/3] Implement numa node notifier Oscar Salvador
2025-06-03 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm,slub: Do not special case N_NORMAL nodes for slab_nodes Oscar Salvador
2025-06-04 9:28 ` Harry Yoo
2025-06-04 11:33 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-06-04 12:16 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-06-03 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm,memory_hotplug: Implement numa node notifier Oscar Salvador
2025-06-04 12:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-04 12:38 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-04 12:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-05 5:18 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-05 8:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-03 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm,memory_hotplug: Rename status_change_nid parameter in memory_notify Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34584ae6-473d-4cf8-923c-3a8e7f16e8ad@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox