From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Korenblit, Miriam Rachel" <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 6.18.13 iwlwifi deadlock allocating cma while work-item is active.
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2026 09:07:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3456b2c89f057900b39ce79ea8ca1154c5014e43.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7d92fab-9d0e-4a58-aa0b-2c6545772e68@candelatech.com>
On Sun, 2026-03-01 at 07:38 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 2/27/26 08:31, Ben Greear wrote:
> > On 2/23/26 14:36, Ben Greear wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I hit a deadlock related to CMA mem allocation attempting to flush all work
> > > while holding some wifi related mutex, and with a work-queue attempting to process a wifi regdomain
> > > work item. I really don't see any good way to fix this,
> > > it would seem that any code that was holding a mutex that could block a work-queue
> > > cannot safely allocate CMA memory? Hopefully someone else has a better idea.
> >
> > I tried using a kthread to do the regulatory domain processing instead of worker item,
> > and that seems to have solved the problem. If that seems reasonable approach to
> > wifi stack folks, I can post a patch.
>
> The other net/wireless work-item 'disconnect_work' also needs to be moved to the kthread
> for the same reason....
I don't think we want to use a kthread for this, it doesn't really make
sense.
Was this with lockdep? If so, it complain about anything?
I'm having a hard time seeing why it would deadlock at all when wifi
uses schedule_work() and therefore the system_percpu_wq, and
__lru_add_drain_all() flushes lru_add_drain_work on mm_percpu_wq, and
lru_add_and_bh_lrus_drain() doesn't really _seem_ to do anything related
to RTNL etc.?
I think we need a real explanation here rather than "if I randomly
change this, it no longer appears".
johannes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-23 22:36 Ben Greear
2026-02-27 16:31 ` Ben Greear
2026-03-01 15:38 ` Ben Greear
2026-03-02 8:07 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3456b2c89f057900b39ce79ea8ca1154c5014e43.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox