From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Fix corrupted PG_arch_1 by set_pmd_at()
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 09:29:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33cfab46-3b9b-0088-17b5-bc821c74aefb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210702103225.51448-1-gshan@redhat.com>
Hello Gavin,
On 7/2/21 4:02 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
> There are two addresses selected: random virtual address and physical
> address corresponding to kernel symbol @start_kernel. During the PMD
> tests in pmd_advanced_tests(), the physical address is aligned down
> to the starting address of the huge page, whose size is 512MB on ARM64
> when we have 64KB base page size. After that, set_pmd_at() is called
> to populate the PMD entry. PG_arch_1, PG_dcache_clean on ARM64, is
> set to the page flags. Unforunately, the page, corresponding to the
> starting address of the huge page could be owned by buddy. It means
> PG_arch_1 can be unconditionally set to page owned by buddy.
>
> Afterwards, the page with PG_arch_1 set is fetched from buddy's free
> area list, but fails the checking. It leads to the following warning
> on ARM64:
>
> BUG: Bad page state in process memhog pfn:08000
> page:0000000015c0a628 refcount:0 mapcount:0 \
> mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x1 pfn:0x8000
> flags: 0x7ffff8000000800(arch_1|node=0|zone=0|lastcpupid=0xfffff)
> raw: 07ffff8000000800 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
> raw: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
> page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP flag(s) set
Does this problem happen right after the boot ? OR you ran some tests
and workloads to trigger this ? IIRC never seen this before on arm64.
Does this happen on other archs too ?
>
> This fixes the issue by calling flush_dcache_page() after each call
> to set_{pud, pmd, pte}_at() because PG_arch_1 isn't needed in any case.
This (arm64 specific solution) might cause some side effects on other
platforms ? The solution here needs to be generic enough. I will take
a look into this patch but probably later this week or next week.
- Anshuman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-05 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-02 10:32 Gavin Shan
2021-07-02 18:10 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-03 0:30 ` Gavin Shan
2021-07-05 3:59 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2021-07-06 5:09 ` Gavin Shan
2021-07-08 0:35 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-12 3:21 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-07-12 8:24 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33cfab46-3b9b-0088-17b5-bc821c74aefb@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox