linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: 1587089010-110083-1-git-send-email-bernard@vivo.com,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: opensource.kernel@vivo.com, Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] kmalloc_index optimization(code size & runtime stable)
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:13:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <339dbb54-b4bc-78e2-e3f0-986814e86d0e@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421032501.127370-1-bernard@vivo.com>

On 4/21/20 5:25 AM, Bernard Zhao wrote:
> kmalloc_index inline function code size optimization and runtime
> performance stability optimization. After optimization, the function
> kmalloc_index is more stable, the size will never affecte the function`s
> execution efficiency.
> And follow test data shows that the performance of new optimization
> exceeds the original algorithm when applying for more than 512 Bytes
> (include 512B).And new optimization runtime is more stable than before.
> Test platform:install vmware ubuntu 16.04, ram 2G, cpu 1, i5-8500 3.00GHz
> Compiler: gcc -O2 optimization, gcc version 5.4.0.
> Just test diff code part.
> Follow is detailed test data:
>             size        time/Per 100 million times
>                         old fun		new fun with optimise
> 		8	203777		241934
> 		16	245611		409278
> 		32	236384		408419
> 		64	275499		447732
> 		128	354909		416439
> 		256	360472		406598
> 		512	431072		409168
> 		1024	463822		407401
>         2 * 1024	548519		407710
>         4 * 1024	623378		422326
>         8 * 1024	655932		407457
>        16 * 1024	744673		417574
>        32 * 1024	824889		415316
>        64 * 1024	854374		408577
>       128 * 1024	968079		433582
>       256 * 1024	985527		412080
>       512 * 1024	1196877		448199
>      1024 * 1024	1310315		448969
> 2  * 1024 * 1024	1367441		513117
> 4  * 1024 * 1024	1264623		415019
> 8  * 1024 * 1024	1255727		417197
> 16 * 1024 * 1024	1401431		411087
> 32 * 1024 * 1024	1440415		416616
> 64 * 1024 * 1024	1428122		417459

No, the kernel will never see these time improvements (or non-improvements for
small sizes). See how kmalloc() and kmalloc_node() both call kmalloc_index()
only under "if (__builtin_constant_p(size))"
which means kmalloc is called with a (compile-time) constant size, so this code
is only evaluated at compile time, not while kernel is running. Otherwise it
really wouldn't be implemented as a stream of if's :)
The cases that are not compile time constant size end up in kmalloc_slab(), so
you can see how that one is implemented and what its performance is.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-21 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-21  3:25 Bernard Zhao
2020-04-21 11:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-21 11:55   ` 赵军奎
2020-04-21 14:36     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-22  1:12       ` 赵军奎
2020-04-21 13:13 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=339dbb54-b4bc-78e2-e3f0-986814e86d0e@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=1587089010-110083-1-git-send-email-bernard@vivo.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bernard@vivo.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=opensource.kernel@vivo.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox