From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/ptdump: Replace READ_ONCE() with standard page table accessors
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 21:38:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3399336c-f08e-479f-aa9d-de6bac9bda61@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25653f37-6ba3-442f-9348-d879a8ad4704@redhat.com>
On 30/09/25 8:13 pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 30.09.25 09:00, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30/09/25 12:11 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 30.09.25 06:37, Dev Jain wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 30/09/25 8:22 am, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>>> Replace READ_ONCE() with standard page table accessors i.e
>>>>> pxdp_get() which
>>>>> anyways default into READ_ONCE() in cases where platform does not
>>>>> override.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>>>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>>>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> mm/ptdump.c | 8 ++++----
>>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/ptdump.c b/mm/ptdump.c
>>>>> index b600c7f864b8..18861501b533 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/ptdump.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/ptdump.c
>>>>> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static int ptdump_pgd_entry(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned
>>>>> long addr,
>>>>> unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct ptdump_state *st = walk->private;
>>>>> - pgd_t val = READ_ONCE(*pgd);
>>>>> + pgd_t val = pgdp_get(pgd);
>>>>> #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 4 && \
>>>>> (defined(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) ||
>>>>> defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS))
>>>>> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static int ptdump_p4d_entry(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned
>>>>> long addr,
>>>>> unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct ptdump_state *st = walk->private;
>>>>> - p4d_t val = READ_ONCE(*p4d);
>>>>> + p4d_t val = p4dp_get(p4d);
>>>>> #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 3 && \
>>>>> (defined(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) ||
>>>>> defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS))
>>>>> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static int ptdump_pud_entry(pud_t *pud, unsigned
>>>>> long addr,
>>>>> unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct ptdump_state *st = walk->private;
>>>>> - pud_t val = READ_ONCE(*pud);
>>>>> + pud_t val = pudp_get(pud);
>>>>> #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2 && \
>>>>> (defined(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) ||
>>>>> defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS))
>>>>> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static int ptdump_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd,
>>>>> unsigned long addr,
>>>>> unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct ptdump_state *st = walk->private;
>>>>> - pmd_t val = READ_ONCE(*pmd);
>>>>> + pmd_t val = pmdp_get(pmd);
>>>>
>>>> I believe this should go through pmdp_get_lockless(). I can see in
>>>> pgtable.h that
>>>> some magic is required on some arches to decode the pmd correctly
>>>> in case walking
>>>> without locks.
>>>
>>> pmdp_get_lockless() is a nasty thingy to handle selected 32bit
>>> architectures.
>>>
>>> But given that we're using ptep_get_lockless() in ptdump_pmd_entry()
>>> it probably wouldn't hurt to use pmdp_get_lockless() here.
>>>
>>> Staring at ARCH_HAS_PTDUMP, I don't think any 32bit arch would
>>> actually end up compiling ptdump.c.
>>>
>>> E.g., on x86 only X86_64 ends up selecting ARCH_HAS_PTDUMP.
>>>
>>
>> pxdp_get_lockless() not really required here, let's stick with
>> pxdp_get() instead.
>
> I'd suggest that we keep it consistent. That is, also removing the
> ptep_get_lockless() if not really required.
So in theory, the _lockless variant is not required, but surely
consistency would mean that since we are
dereferencing the pte without the PTL, we should use the _lockless variant?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-30 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-30 2:52 Anshuman Khandual
2025-09-30 4:37 ` Dev Jain
2025-09-30 6:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-30 7:00 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-09-30 14:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-30 16:08 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-09-30 14:30 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-30 18:21 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3399336c-f08e-479f-aa9d-de6bac9bda61@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox