linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	"Liam.Howlett@oracle.com" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"debug@rivosinc.com" <debug@rivosinc.com>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
	<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] parisc: Use initializer for struct vm_unmapped_area_info
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:04:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <32e7ccca-3bb1-4763-9b04-7a15a02a52ac@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240312222843.2505560-7-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>



Le 12/03/2024 à 23:28, Rick Edgecombe a écrit :
> Future changes will need to add a new member to struct
> vm_unmapped_area_info. This would cause trouble for any call site that
> doesn't initialize the struct. Currently every caller sets each member
> manually, so if new members are added they will be uninitialized and the
> core code parsing the struct will see garbage in the new member.
> 
> It could be possible to initialize the new member manually to 0 at each
> call site. This and a couple other options were discussed, and a working
> consensus (see links) was that in general the best way to accomplish this
> would be via static initialization with designated member initiators.
> Having some struct vm_unmapped_area_info instances not zero initialized
> will put those sites at risk of feeding garbage into vm_unmapped_area() if
> the convention is to zero initialize the struct and any new member addition
> misses a call site that initializes each member manually.
> 
> It could be possible to leave the code mostly untouched, and just change
> the line:
> struct vm_unmapped_area_info info
> to:
> struct vm_unmapped_area_info info = {};
> 
> However, that would leave cleanup for the members that are manually set
> to zero, as it would no longer be required.
> 
> So to be reduce the chance of bugs via uninitialized members, instead
> simply continue the process to initialize the struct this way tree wide.
> This will zero any unspecified members. Move the member initializers to the
> struct declaration when they are known at that time. Leave the members out
> that were manually initialized to zero, as this would be redundant for
> designated initializers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>


> Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
> Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202402280912.33AEE7A9CF@keescook/#t
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/j7bfvig3gew3qruouxrh7z7ehjjafrgkbcmg6tcghhfh3rhmzi@wzlcoecgy5rs/
> ---
> v3:
>   - Fixed spelling errors in log
>   - Be consistent about field vs member in log
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This patch was split and refactored out of a tree-wide change [0] to just
> zero-init each struct vm_unmapped_area_info. The overall goal of the
> series is to help shadow stack guard gaps. Currently, there is only one
> arch with shadow stacks, but two more are in progress. It is compile tested
> only.
> 
> There was further discussion that this method of initializing the structs
> while nice in some ways has a greater risk of introducing bugs in some of
> the more complicated callers. Since this version was reviewed my arch
> maintainers already, leave it as was already acknowledged.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rick
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240226190951.3240433-6-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com/
> ---
>   arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc.c
> index 98af719d5f85..f7722451276e 100644
> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc.c
> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/sys_parisc.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,9 @@ static unsigned long arch_get_unmapped_area_common(struct file *filp,
>   	struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev;
>   	unsigned long filp_pgoff;
>   	int do_color_align;
> -	struct vm_unmapped_area_info info;
> +	struct vm_unmapped_area_info info = {
> +		.length = len
> +	};
>   
>   	if (unlikely(len > TASK_SIZE))
>   		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -139,7 +141,6 @@ static unsigned long arch_get_unmapped_area_common(struct file *filp,
>   			return addr;
>   	}
>   
> -	info.length = len;
>   	info.align_mask = do_color_align ? (PAGE_MASK & (SHM_COLOUR - 1)) : 0;
>   	info.align_offset = shared_align_offset(filp_pgoff, pgoff);
>   
> @@ -160,7 +161,6 @@ static unsigned long arch_get_unmapped_area_common(struct file *filp,
>   		 */
>   	}
>   
> -	info.flags = 0;
>   	info.low_limit = mm->mmap_base;
>   	info.high_limit = mmap_upper_limit(NULL);
>   	return vm_unmapped_area(&info);

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-13  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-12 22:28 [PATCH v3 00/12] Cover a guard gap corner case Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-12 22:28 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] mm: Switch mm->get_unmapped_area() to a flag Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-13  7:19   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-13 14:48     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-03-13 17:20       ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-12 22:28 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] mm: Introduce arch_get_unmapped_area_vmflags() Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-13  7:22   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-13 14:51     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-03-12 22:28 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] mm: Use get_unmapped_area_vmflags() Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-13  9:05   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-13 14:55     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-03-13 16:49       ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-13 15:55     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-03-12 22:28 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] thp: Add thp_get_unmapped_area_vmflags() Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-13  9:04   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-12 22:28 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] csky: Use initializer for struct vm_unmapped_area_info Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-13  9:04   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-12 22:28 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] parisc: " Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-13  9:04   ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2024-03-12 22:28 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] powerpc: " Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-13  6:44   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-13 14:57     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-03-13 21:58       ` Michael Ellerman
2024-03-12 22:28 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] treewide: " Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-13  3:18   ` Kees Cook
2024-03-13 15:40     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-03-12 22:28 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] mm: Take placement mappings gap into account Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-13  9:04   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-13 14:58     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-03-13 16:51       ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-12 22:28 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] x86/mm: Implement HAVE_ARCH_UNMAPPED_AREA_VMFLAGS Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-13  9:04   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-13 16:00     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-03-18  1:00       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-03-12 22:28 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] x86/mm: Care about shadow stack guard gap during placement Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-12 22:28 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] selftests/x86: Add placement guard gap test for shstk Rick Edgecombe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=32e7ccca-3bb1-4763-9b04-7a15a02a52ac@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox