From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>, Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab: replace cache_from_obj() with inline checks
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 16:24:23 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3212f83f-960b-9a8c-2cb8-d617a201f094@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iJhz9RfpG62kW1XmL1=cTKvVN5kS-KM+TpzE-mPW4WhUQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 21 Jan 2026, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Eric Dumazet has noticed cache_from_obj() is not inlined with clang and
> > suggested splitting it into two functions, where the smaller inlined one
> > assumes the fastpath is !CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED. However most
> > distros enable it these days and so this would likely add a function
> > call to the object free fastpaths.
> >
> > Instead take a step back and consider that cache_from_obj() is a relict
> > from when memcgs created their separate kmem_cache copies, as the
> > outdated comment in build_detached_freelist() reminds us.
> >
> > Meanwhile hardening/debugging had reused cache_from_obj() to validate
> > that the freed object really belongs to a slab from the cache we think
> > we are freeing from.
> >
> > In build_detached_freelist() simply remove this, because it did not
> > handle the NULL result from cache_from_obj() failure properly, nor
> > validate objects (for the NULL slab->slab_cache pointer) when called via
> > kfree_bulk(). If anyone is motivated to implement it properly, it should
> > be possible in a similar way to kmem_cache_free().
> >
> > In kmem_cache_free(), do the hardening/debugging checks directly so they
> > are inlined by definition and virt_to_slab(obj) is performed just once.
> > In case they failed, call a newly introduced warn_free_bad_obj() that
> > performs the warnings outside of the fastpath, and leak the object.
> >
> > As an intentional change, leak the object when slab->slab_cache differs
> > from the cache given to kmem_cache_free(). Previously we would only leak
> > when the object is not in a valid slab page or the slab->slab_cache
> > pointer is NULL, and otherwise trust the slab->slab_cache over the
> > kmem_cache_free() argument. But if those differ, it means something went
> > wrong enough that it's best not to continue freeing.
> >
> > As a result the fastpath should be inlined in all configs and the
> > warnings are moved away.
> >
> > Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260115130642.3419324-1-edumazet@google.com/
> > Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
> > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>
Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-25 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-21 6:57 Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-21 8:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-01-25 0:24 ` David Rientjes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3212f83f-960b-9a8c-2cb8-d617a201f094@google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox