From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 14/16] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 10:07:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <315d1dc7-9eda-45cd-863d-803bfae4c29b@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zlb0BugOwko4PrLm@localhost.localdomain>
Le 29/05/2024 à 11:23, Oscar Salvador a écrit :
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 03:30:12PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> On book3s/64, the only user of hugepd is hash in 4k mode.
>>
>> All other setups (hash-64, radix-4, radix-64) use leaf PMD/PUD.
>>
>> Rework hash-4k to use contiguous PMD and PUD instead.
>>
>> In that setup there are only two huge page sizes: 16M and 16G.
>>
>> 16M sits at PMD level and 16G at PUD level.
>
>
> On 4k mode, PMD_SIZE is 2MB and PUD_SIZE is 256MB, right?
Correct, as documented in arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h
>
>> +static inline unsigned long hash__pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> + unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, unsigned long clr,
>> + unsigned long set,
>> + int huge)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long old;
>> +
>> + old = hash__pte_update_one(ptep, clr, set);
>> +
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_4K_PAGES) && huge) {
>> + unsigned int psize = get_slice_psize(mm, addr);
>> + int nb, i;
>> +
>> + if (psize == MMU_PAGE_16M)
>> + nb = SZ_16M / PMD_SIZE;
>> + else if (psize == MMU_PAGE_16G)
>> + nb = SZ_16G / PUD_SIZE;
>> + else
>> + nb = 1;
>
> On 4K, hugepages are either 16M or 16G. How can we end up in a situation
> whwere the is pte is huge, but is is neither MMU_PAGE_16G nor MMU_PAGE_16M?
We can't but I didn't want to leave nb undefined or with a value that
might lead to writing in the weed. Value 1 seems a safe default.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hugetlbpage.c
>> index 5a2e512e96db..83c3361b358b 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hugetlbpage.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hugetlbpage.c
>> @@ -53,6 +53,16 @@ int __hash_page_huge(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
>> /* If PTE permissions don't match, take page fault */
>> if (unlikely(!check_pte_access(access, old_pte)))
>> return 1;
>> + /*
>> + * If hash-4k, hugepages use seeral contiguous PxD entries
> 'several'
>> + * so bail out and let mm make the page young or dirty
>> + */
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_4K_PAGES)) {
>> + if (!(old_pte & _PAGE_ACCESSED))
>> + return 1;
>> + if ((access & _PAGE_WRITE) && !(old_pte & _PAGE_DIRTY))
>> + return 1;
>
> I have 0 clue about this code. What would happen if we do not bail out?
>
In that case the pte_xchg() in the while () will only set ACCESS or
DIRTY bit on the first PxD entry, not on all cont-PxD entries.
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-27 13:29 [RFC PATCH v4 00/16] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/16] powerpc/64e: Remove unused IBM HTW code [SQUASHED] Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/16] mm: Define __pte_leaf_size() to also take a PMD entry Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/16] mm: Provide mm_struct and address to huge_ptep_get() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-28 4:12 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-28 5:41 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-28 11:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/16] powerpc/mm: Remove _PAGE_PSIZE Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/16] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/16] powerpc/mm: Allow hugepages without hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/16] powerpc/8xx: Fix size given to set_huge_pte_at() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/16] powerpc/8xx: Rework support for 8M pages using contiguous PTE entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 8:02 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 9:39 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/16] powerpc/8xx: Simplify struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/16] powerpc/e500: Remove enc and ind fields from " Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/16] powerpc/e500: Switch to 64 bits PGD on 85xx (32 bits) Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/16] powerpc/e500: Encode hugepage size in PTE bits Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 8:05 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 9:49 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:09 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:15 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/16] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 8:49 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 9:58 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:05 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/16] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 9:23 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:07 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2024-05-29 10:11 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/16] powerpc/mm: Remove hugepd leftovers Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:12 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/16] mm: Remove CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:13 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 20:49 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/16] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=315d1dc7-9eda-45cd-863d-803bfae4c29b@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox