From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] seqlock,mm: lockdep annotation + write_seqlock_irqsave()
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 11:27:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3120e8b4-a3e9-3612-f232-b89afe56532f@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230623171232.892937-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
On 2023/06/24 2:12, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this has been a single patch (2/2) but then it was pointed out that the
> lockdep annotation in seqlock needs to be adjusted to fully close the
> printk window so that there is no printing after the seq-lock has been
> acquired and before printk_deferred_enter() takes effect.
>
> I'm sending both patches in this series so both sides (locking and mm)
> are aware of the situation.
> I hope that both patches can be applied independently via their subsystem
> tree (the lockdep splat + deadlock is low risk).
>
> The original thread starts at
> https://lore.kernel.org/20230621104034.HT6QnNkQ@linutronix.de
>
> Sebastian
The original thread is too long to read. Below is a full summary for locking
maintainers to accept [PATCH 1/2].
When commit 1ca7d67cf5d5 ("seqcount: Add lockdep functionality to
seqcount/seqlock structures") added seqcount_acquire(&s->dep_map) check to
write_seqcount_begin_nested() and seqcount_release(&s->dep_map) check to
write_seqcount_end(), the ordering of updating s->sequence and doing lockdep
annotation was not important.
But since commit 3d36424b3b58 ("mm/page_alloc: fix race condition between
build_all_zonelists and page allocation") started calling
read_seqbegin(&zonelist_update_seq)/read_seqretry(&zonelist_update_seq) from
kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) path, commit 1007843a9190 ("mm/page_alloc: fix potential
deadlock on zonelist_update_seq seqlock") tried to close the race window using
__build_all_zonelists() {
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ printk_deferred_enter();
write_seqlock(&zonelist_update_seq);
(...snipped...)
write_sequnlock(&zonelist_update_seq);
+ printk_deferred_exit();
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
pattern. The reason behind this ordering was to
satisfy "printk_deferred_enter() depends on local IRQs being disabled"
and
make sure that "no synchronous printk() (for whatever reasons, not only
printk() from build_zonelists() from __build_all_zonelists(), but also
including printk() from lockdep, soft-lockup, KCSAN etc.) happens between
write_seqlock() and write_sequnlock()
. However, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior mentioned that this ordering is
problematic if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y, for disabling local IRQs conflicts with
"spin_lock(&zonelist_update_seq.lock) from write_seqlock(&zonelist_update_seq)
needs to be able to sleep", and Sebastian is proposing
__build_all_zonelists() {
- local_irq_save(flags);
- printk_deferred_enter();
- write_seqlock(&zonelist_update_seq);
+ write_seqlock_irqsave(&zonelist_update_seq, flags);
+ printk_deferred_enter();
(...snipped...)
+ printk_deferred_exit();
+ write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&zonelist_update_seq, flags);
- write_sequnlock(&zonelist_update_seq);
- printk_deferred_exit();
- local_irq_restore(flags);
}
change as [PATCH 2/2]. Since write_seqlock_irqsave() becomes write_seqlock()
if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y, this change can solve the conflict.
In order to accept this proposal, we need to make sure that
no synchronous printk() happens between
write_seqlock_irqsave(&zonelist_update_seq, flags) made
zonelist_update_seq.seqcount odd
and
printk_deferred_enter() takes effect
and
no synchronous printk() happens between
printk_deferred_exit() took effect
and
write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&zonelist_update_seq, flags) makes
zonelist_update_seq.seqcount even
, and Sebastian is proposing
static inline void do_write_seqcount_begin_nested(seqcount_t *s, int subclass)
{
- do_raw_write_seqcount_begin(s);
seqcount_acquire(&s->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
+ do_raw_write_seqcount_begin(s);
}
static inline void do_write_seqcount_end(seqcount_t *s)
{
- seqcount_release(&s->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
do_raw_write_seqcount_end(s);
+ seqcount_release(&s->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
}
as [PATCH 1/2].
With [PATCH 1/2] and [PATCH 2/2], possibility of synchronous printk() changes like below.
__build_all_zonelists() {
write_seqlock_irqsave(&zonelist_update_seq, flags) {
__write_seqlock_irqsave(&zonelist_update_seq) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&zonelist_update_seq.lock, flags); // local IRQs disabled = synchronous printk() from IRQs is disabled here
do_write_seqcount_begin(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount) {
do_write_seqcount_begin_nested(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount, 0) {
seqcount_acquire(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); // synchronous printk() from lockdep might happen here
do_raw_write_seqcount_begin(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount) {
seqcount_acquire(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); // zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.sequence is guaranteed to be even = kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) with port lock held is safe = synchronous printk() is safe
kcsan_nestable_atomic_begin(); // KCSAN is diabled = synchronous printk() from KCSAN is disabled here
zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.sequence++; // zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.sequence is now odd = kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) with port lock held is not safe = synchronous printk() is not safe
}
}
}
}
}
printk_deferred_enter(); // synchronous printk() from whatever reason is disabled here
(...snipped...)
printk_deferred_exit(); // synchronous printk() from whatever reason is enabled here
write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&zonelist_update_seq, flags) {
do_write_seqcount_end(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount) {
do_raw_write_seqcount_end(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount) {
zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.sequence++; // zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.sequence is now even = kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) with port lock held is safe = synchronous printk() is safe
kcsan_nestable_atomic_end(); // KCSAN is enabled = synchronous printk() from KCSAN is enabled here
}
seqcount_release(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.dep_map, _RET_IP_); // synchronous printk() from lockdep might happen here
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zonelist_update_seq.lock, flags); // local IRQs enabled = synchronous printk() from IRQs is enabled here
}
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-25 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-23 17:12 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-23 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] seqlock: Do the lockdep annotation before locking in do_write_seqcount_begin_nested() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-24 6:54 ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-06-26 8:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-26 9:25 ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-06-26 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-26 11:26 ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-06-26 11:35 ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-26 12:27 ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-06-26 13:16 ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-26 12:46 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-26 13:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-26 14:44 ` Petr Mladek
2023-06-28 12:14 ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-07-27 15:10 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-07-29 5:31 ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-07-29 11:05 ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-07-31 14:25 ` Michal Hocko
2023-08-03 13:18 ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-08-03 14:49 ` Michal Hocko
2023-08-04 13:27 ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-08-07 8:20 ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-26 12:56 ` Mel Gorman
2023-06-23 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/page_alloc: Use write_seqlock_irqsave() instead write_seqlock() + local_irq_save() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-23 18:17 ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-23 20:15 ` [PATCH v3 " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-26 7:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-26 13:14 ` Mel Gorman
2023-06-28 13:56 ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-25 2:27 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3120e8b4-a3e9-3612-f232-b89afe56532f@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox