linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] seqlock,mm: lockdep annotation + write_seqlock_irqsave()
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 11:27:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3120e8b4-a3e9-3612-f232-b89afe56532f@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230623171232.892937-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>

On 2023/06/24 2:12, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this has been a single patch (2/2) but then it was pointed out that the
> lockdep annotation in seqlock needs to be adjusted to fully close the
> printk window so that there is no printing after the seq-lock has been
> acquired and before printk_deferred_enter() takes effect.
> 
> I'm sending both patches in this series so both sides (locking and mm)
> are aware of the situation. 
> I hope that both patches can be applied independently via their subsystem
> tree (the lockdep splat + deadlock is low risk).
> 
> The original thread starts at
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/20230621104034.HT6QnNkQ@linutronix.de
> 
> Sebastian

The original thread is too long to read. Below is a full summary for locking
maintainers to accept [PATCH 1/2].



When commit 1ca7d67cf5d5 ("seqcount: Add lockdep functionality to
seqcount/seqlock structures") added seqcount_acquire(&s->dep_map) check to
write_seqcount_begin_nested() and seqcount_release(&s->dep_map) check to
write_seqcount_end(), the ordering of updating s->sequence and doing lockdep
annotation was not important.

But since commit 3d36424b3b58 ("mm/page_alloc: fix race condition between
build_all_zonelists and page allocation") started calling
read_seqbegin(&zonelist_update_seq)/read_seqretry(&zonelist_update_seq) from
kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) path, commit 1007843a9190 ("mm/page_alloc: fix potential
deadlock on zonelist_update_seq seqlock") tried to close the race window using

 __build_all_zonelists() {
+    local_irq_save(flags);
+    printk_deferred_enter();
     write_seqlock(&zonelist_update_seq);
     (...snipped...)
     write_sequnlock(&zonelist_update_seq);
+    printk_deferred_exit();
+    local_irq_restore(flags);
 }

pattern. The reason behind this ordering was to

  satisfy "printk_deferred_enter() depends on local IRQs being disabled"

and

  make sure that "no synchronous printk() (for whatever reasons, not only
  printk() from build_zonelists() from __build_all_zonelists(), but also
  including printk() from lockdep, soft-lockup, KCSAN etc.) happens between
  write_seqlock() and write_sequnlock()

. However, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior mentioned that this ordering is
problematic if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y, for disabling local IRQs conflicts with
"spin_lock(&zonelist_update_seq.lock) from write_seqlock(&zonelist_update_seq)
needs to be able to sleep", and Sebastian is proposing

 __build_all_zonelists() {
-    local_irq_save(flags);
-    printk_deferred_enter();
-    write_seqlock(&zonelist_update_seq);
+    write_seqlock_irqsave(&zonelist_update_seq, flags);
+    printk_deferred_enter();
     (...snipped...)
+    printk_deferred_exit();
+    write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&zonelist_update_seq, flags);
-    write_sequnlock(&zonelist_update_seq);
-    printk_deferred_exit();
-    local_irq_restore(flags);
 }

change as [PATCH 2/2]. Since write_seqlock_irqsave() becomes write_seqlock()
if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y, this change can solve the conflict.

In order to accept this proposal, we need to make sure that

  no synchronous printk() happens between

    write_seqlock_irqsave(&zonelist_update_seq, flags) made
    zonelist_update_seq.seqcount odd

  and

    printk_deferred_enter() takes effect

and

  no synchronous printk() happens between

    printk_deferred_exit() took effect

  and

    write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&zonelist_update_seq, flags) makes
    zonelist_update_seq.seqcount even

, and Sebastian is proposing

 static inline void do_write_seqcount_begin_nested(seqcount_t *s, int subclass)
 {
-    do_raw_write_seqcount_begin(s);
     seqcount_acquire(&s->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
+    do_raw_write_seqcount_begin(s);
 }

 static inline void do_write_seqcount_end(seqcount_t *s)
 {
-    seqcount_release(&s->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
     do_raw_write_seqcount_end(s);
+    seqcount_release(&s->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
 }

as [PATCH 1/2].

With [PATCH 1/2] and [PATCH 2/2], possibility of synchronous printk() changes like below.

__build_all_zonelists() {
  write_seqlock_irqsave(&zonelist_update_seq, flags) {
    __write_seqlock_irqsave(&zonelist_update_seq) {
      spin_lock_irqsave(&zonelist_update_seq.lock, flags); // local IRQs disabled = synchronous printk() from IRQs is disabled here
      do_write_seqcount_begin(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount) {
        do_write_seqcount_begin_nested(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount, 0) {
          seqcount_acquire(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); // synchronous printk() from lockdep might happen here
          do_raw_write_seqcount_begin(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount) {
            seqcount_acquire(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); // zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.sequence is guaranteed to be even = kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) with port lock held is safe = synchronous printk() is safe
            kcsan_nestable_atomic_begin(); // KCSAN is diabled = synchronous printk() from KCSAN is disabled here
            zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.sequence++; // zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.sequence is now odd = kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) with port lock held is not safe = synchronous printk() is not safe
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
  printk_deferred_enter(); // synchronous printk() from whatever reason is disabled here
  (...snipped...)
  printk_deferred_exit(); // synchronous printk() from whatever reason is enabled here
  write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&zonelist_update_seq, flags) {
    do_write_seqcount_end(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount) {
      do_raw_write_seqcount_end(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount) {
        zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.sequence++; // zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.sequence is now even = kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) with port lock held is safe = synchronous printk() is safe
        kcsan_nestable_atomic_end(); // KCSAN is enabled = synchronous printk() from KCSAN is enabled here
      }
      seqcount_release(&zonelist_update_seq.seqcount.seqcount.dep_map, _RET_IP_); // synchronous printk() from lockdep might happen here
    }
    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zonelist_update_seq.lock, flags); // local IRQs enabled = synchronous printk() from IRQs is enabled here
  }
}



      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-25  2:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-23 17:12 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-23 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] seqlock: Do the lockdep annotation before locking in do_write_seqcount_begin_nested() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-24  6:54   ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-06-26  8:12     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-26  9:25       ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-06-26 10:48         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-26 11:26           ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-06-26 11:35             ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-26 12:27               ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-06-26 13:16                 ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-26 12:46               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-26 13:13           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-26 14:44       ` Petr Mladek
2023-06-28 12:14         ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-07-27 15:10           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-07-29  5:31             ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-07-29 11:05               ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-07-31 14:25                 ` Michal Hocko
2023-08-03 13:18                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-08-03 14:49                     ` Michal Hocko
2023-08-04 13:27                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-08-07  8:20                         ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-26 12:56   ` Mel Gorman
2023-06-23 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/page_alloc: Use write_seqlock_irqsave() instead write_seqlock() + local_irq_save() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-23 18:17   ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-23 20:15     ` [PATCH v3 " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-26  7:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-26 13:14       ` Mel Gorman
2023-06-28 13:56       ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-25  2:27 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3120e8b4-a3e9-3612-f232-b89afe56532f@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox